Published online Feb 21, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i7.759
Peer-review started: November 19, 2023
First decision: December 15, 2023
Revised: December 18, 2023
Accepted: January 23, 2024
Article in press: January 23, 2024
Published online: February 21, 2024
Processing time: 93 Days and 20.8 Hours
Advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are difficult to treat with low overall survival (OS). In pNET development, hyperactivation of PI3K/Akt signaling and activation of the mTOR pathway mediated through insulin-like growth factor-1 have been implicated to play a crucial role in carcinogenesis, thus providing the rationale for metformin use. Moreover, although risk factors for pNET are still inconclusive, type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been described as an essential contributor to tumor development, with a high incidence and prevalence of diabetes seen among pNET patients. This systematic review evaluates the role of T2DM and metformin in the insurgence and post-treatment outcomes in patients with pNET.
Regarding scarce data on pNET treatment and risk factors we wanted to investigate and analyze available data related to diagnostic and prognostic value of T2DM and metformin in association with pNET.
The main aim of this review was to systematically analyze and summarize evidence related to the diagnostic and prognostic value of T2DM and metformin for predicting the insurgence and post-treatment outcomes of pNETs.
A systematic review of the published literature was undertaken, focusing on the role of T2DM and metformin in insurgence and prognosis of pNET, measured through outcomes of tumor-free survival (TFS), OS and progression-free survival.
A total of 13 studies (n = 5674 patients) were included in this review. Analysis of 809 pNET cases from five retrospective studies (low study heterogeneity with I2 = 0%) confirms the correlation between T2DM and insurgence of pNET (odds ratios = 2.13, 95%CI = 1.56-4.55; P < 0.001). The pooled data from 1174 pNET patients showed the correlation between T2DM and post-treatment (TFS) in pNET patients (hazard ratio = 1.84, 95%CI = 0.78-2.90; P < 0.001). The study heterogeneity was intermediate, with I2 = 51%. A few studies limited the possibility of performing pooled analysis in the setting of metformin; therefore, results were heterogeneous, with no statistical relevance to the use of this drug in the diagnosis and prognosis of pNET.
T2DM represents a risk factor for the insurgence of pNET and is a significant predictor of poor post-treatment (TFS) of pNET patients. Unfortunately, a few studies with heterogeneous results limited the possibility of exploring the effect of metformin in the diagnosis and prognosis of pNET.
Future research should further try to identify other risk factors and their influence on pNETs as well as the role of metformin in the diagnosis and prognosis of pNET.