Published online Mar 28, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i12.1714
Peer-review started: November 4, 2023
First decision: December 7, 2023
Revised: December 26, 2023
Accepted: March 11, 2024
Article in press: March 11, 2024
Published online: March 28, 2024
Processing time: 145 Days and 3.1 Hours
The prognostic value of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is controversial and the prognostic value of hematocrit for CRC patients has not been determined.
This was the first study to show that low hematocrit could predict worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in CRC patients after radical surgery.
The objective of this study was to explore the effect of RDW and hematocrit on the outcomes of CRC patients who underwent radical surgery.
Patients who were diagnosed with CRC and underwent radical CRC resection between January 2011 and January 2020 at a single clinical center were included. An independent-sample t-test was used to compare the difference continuous variables that were expressed as the mean ± SD. χ2 tests or Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical variables that were expressed as absolute values and percentages. The short-term outcomes, OS and DFS were compared among the different groups. To determine independent risk factors for overall complications, logistic regression analysis was conducted. Analysis of Cox regression was conducted to identify independent risk factors for OS and DFS.
There were 4258 CRC patients who underwent radical surgery included in our study. The higher RDW group had a worse OS and DFS than did the lower RDW group for tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage I (OS, P < 0.05; DFS, P = 0.001) and stage II (OS, P = 0.004; DFS, P = 0.01) than the lower RDW group; the lower hematocrit group had worse OS and DFS for TNM stage II (OS, P < 0.05; DFS, P = 0.001) and stage III (OS, P = 0.001; DFS, P = 0.001) than did the higher hematocrit group. RDW (P > 0.05) and hematocrit (P > 0.05) were not identified as independent indicators of overall complications. Preoperative hematocrit was an independent risk factor for OS [P = 0.017, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.256, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.041-1.515] and DFS (P = 0.035, HR = 1.194, 95%CI: 1.013-1.408). However, RDW was not an independent risk factor for OS (P = 0.396) or DFS (P = 0.308).
This was the first study to show that low hematocrit could predict worse OS and DFS in CRC patients after radical surgery. A preoperative higher RDW and lower hematocrit were associated with more postoperative complications. However, only hematocrit was an independent risk factor for OS and DFS in CRC patients who underwent radical surgery, while RDW was not.
Further multicenter prospective studies are needed to investigate the prognostic role of RDW and hematocrit.