Published online Nov 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i42.6045
Peer-review started: July 1, 2022
First decision: August 1, 2022
Revised: August 13, 2022
Accepted: October 14, 2022
Article in press: October 14, 2022
Published online: November 14, 2022
Processing time: 132 Days and 5.2 Hours
There are no obvious clinical symptoms in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients at the early stage, but their liver reserve function (LRF) may be impaired. Early evaluation of LRF is of great help in identifying disease progression. Assessment of LRF is essential for predicting the prognosis of patients with CLD and determines the extent of liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Liver function impairment is the primary determinant in the development of post-hepatectomy liver failure. There are no obvious clinical symptoms in CLD patients at Child-Turcotte-Pugh A stage, but their LRF may be impaired. Due to impossible implementation of the indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test in some CLD patients, a new method to accurately assess LRF is needed.
This study aimed to establish noninvasive models of LRF assessment based on LSM. The new predictive models were established through logistic regression analysis and were validated internally in a prospective cohort. The new models had a good predictive performance on LRF and could replace the ICG clearance test, especially in the patients who are unable to undergo ICG testing.
Clinical data from 360 patients with compensated CLD were retrospectively collected and analyzed in the training cohort. The new predictive models were established through logistic regression analysis and were validated internally in a prospective cohort (132 patients). The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were measured and compared to evaluate the discrimination ability of different models.
Our study defined the indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICGR15) ≥ 10% as mildly impaired LRF and ICGR15 ≥ 20% as severely impaired LRF. We constructed predictive models of LRF, named the mLPaM and sLPaM, which involved only LSM, prothrombin time international normalized ratio to albumin ratio, age and model for end-stage liver disease. The AUC of the mLPaM model (0.855, 0.872, respectively) and sLPaM model (0.869, 0.876, respectively) were higher than that of other methods in the two cohorts. In addition, the new models showed good sensitivity and accuracy for the diagnosis of LRF impairment in the validation cohort.
Our study found that the new models had a good predictive performance for LRF and could replace the ICG clearance test, especially in patients who are unable to undergo ICG testing.
This was not a multicenter study and most of the CLD patients in this study were Asians. Therefore, a multi-center prospective cohort study could further evaluate the performance of the predictive models, and the models in patients of other ethnicities need further investigation. The predictive value of the models in patients with a decompensated stage need further evaluation.