Published online Sep 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i33.4960
Peer-review started: May 19, 2020
First decision: July 29, 2020
Revised: August 3, 2020
Accepted: August 26, 2020
Article in press: August 26, 2020
Published online: September 7, 2020
Processing time: 108 Days and 3 Hours
Chronic liver disease (CLD) patients are frequently complicated by osteoporosis, which causes fragility fractures and reduces health-related quality of life. Denosumab, a fully human anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand antibody, has been shown to be effective for osteoporosis and reduce the risk of osteoporotic fracture in the general population. However, the efficacy and safety of denosumab in CLD patients remains unknown.
Adherence to osteoporosis medication is a crucial problem, given that we frequently encounter poor adherence to prescribed osteoporosis medications in a real-world clinical setting, which can result in an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Denosumab treatment, subcutaneously administered once every 6 mo, is expected to improve medication adherence compared to weekly oral drugs. Recently, denosumab treatment is suggested to improve health-related quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Therefore, denosumab has been the focus of public attention as an attractive treatment for osteoporosis.
The primary objective was to investigate the effect of denosumab on bone mineral density (BMD) and its safety in CLD patients with osteoporosis. The secondary objective was to assess the effect of denosumab on bone quality.
We screened 405 CLD patients for osteoporosis and diagnosed osteoporosis in 138 (34.1%) patients. Among these patients with osteoporosis, 60 were finally included in the present study. Denosumab was administered once every 6 mo. Changes from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip were evaluated at 12 mo of denosumab treatment. Changes in bone turnover and quality were assessed by measurement of serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (bone resorption marker), serum total procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (bone formation maker), and plasma pentosidine (bone quality marker).
BMD values at the lumbar spine (+4.44%), femoral neck (+3.71%), and total hip (+4.03%) were significantly improved at 12 mo of treatment, regardless of differences in baseline characteristics. Denosumab treatment significantly suppressed bone turnover markers and improved a bone quality marker at 12 mo. No patients experienced fractures and adverse events, except for transient hypocalcemia.
Denosumab treatment is effective and safe even in CLD patients with osteoporosis. Thus, denosumab is a beneficial treatment option for osteoporosis in CLD patients.
This study opened up new possibilities for osteoporosis treatment in CLD patients. Specifically, it is noteworthy that denosumab treatment improved a bone quality marker along with BMD. A large-scale, randomized controlled study is needed to confirm the long-term effects of denosumab.