Published online Mar 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1132
Peer-review started: October 23, 2018
First decision: November 29, 2019
Revised: January 12, 2019
Accepted: January 28, 2019
Article in press: January 28, 2019
Published online: March 7, 2019
Processing time: 135 Days and 7.4 Hours
The Czech Republic is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide. The actual participation of asymptomatic individuals in screening procedures (approximately 30% in 2016) is still far from the desired rate. Public awareness of CRC and uptake of CRC screening remain challenges.
The viewpoints of the target population (asymptomatic individuals older than 50) regarding CRC screening information sources and the reasons for and against participation in CRC screening are not well known. Tailored screening support and promotion may increase participation rates and efficacy of screening program.
This study aimed to acquire independent opinions from the target population regarding CRC screening information sources and the reasons for and against participation in CRC screening, independently on the health system.
A survey among relatives (aged 50 and older) of university students was conducted. Participants answered a questionnaire about sources of awareness regarding CRC screening, reasons for and against participation, and suggestions for improvements in CRC screening. The effect of certain variables on participation in CRC screening was analyzed.
The majority of respondents had some information about CRC screening. General practitioners (GPs) (64.1%) and traditional media (33.3%) were the most common information sources regarding CRC screening. Only 24.7% respondents had never participated in a screening. A lack of interest or time and a fear of colonoscopy or positive results were reported as reasons for non-participation. Individuals aged > 60 years, females and relatives of CRC patients were more likely to participate in screening. Information regarding screening provided by physicians - GPs and other specialists increased participation in screening importantly. Respondents suggested that providing better explanations regarding screening procedures and equipment for stool capturing could improve CRC screening uptake.
GPs and other specialists play a crucial role in improving the uptake of CRC screening, while other educational tools were less effective. Reduction of the fears of colonoscopy by focused campaigns, routine use of analgosedation, and better equipment for stool sampling might encourage the target population to participate in screenings.
In the future, regular surveys of the target populations’ attitude toward CRC screening may gain interesting facts for further improvement of the screening program. Focus on the role of physician’s advice for the screening participation and better communication during routine health consultation regarding the results of screening tests and related benefits could increase participation rates.