Published online May 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i17.2110
Peer-review started: January 11, 2019
First decision: January 30, 2019
Revised: February 15, 2019
Accepted: February 22, 2019
Article in press: February 23, 2019
Published online: May 7, 2019
Processing time: 115 Days and 23.4 Hours
Profound changes have been observed in the gastric and intestinal microbiota of proton pump inhibitor users. Probiotics are commonly administered to patients with intestinal flora abnormalities. No prior studies have been conducted to evaluate the therapeutic effects of probiotics [Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) and Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium)] on patients with reflux esophagitis (RE).
We conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the impact of disordered gut microbiota on RE as well as the therapeutic effect of probiotics supplements on patients with RE.
This clinical trial aimed to study the RE patients treated with the combination of probiotic (B. subtilis and E. faecium) and esomeprazole.
This study included 134 patients with RE who met the criteria. In phase 1, patients were divided into two groups. The probiotics group was given esomeprazole and live combined B. subtilis and E. faecium enteric-coated capsules for eight weeks, and the placebo group was given esomeprazole and placebo for eight weeks. Endoscopic evaluation, gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS), reflux diagnostic questionnaire (RDQ), and lactulose hydrogen breath test (LHBT) were performed at the end of the treatment. In phase 2, patients who achieved endoscopic and clinical cure (RDQ < 12) entered the follow-up. RDQ and LHBT were completed at the follow-up endpoint.
After eight-week treatment, the GSRS diarrhea syndrome score was decreased significantly in the probiotics group, and the small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) negative rate in the probiotics group was significantly higher than that in the placebo group. Furthermore, the therapy had a significant influence on relapse time, and the risk of relapse in the probiotics group was lower than that in the placebo group at any time point during the 12-wk follow-up (hazard ratio = 0.52). However, only B. subtilis and E. faecium as probiotics were studied on gut microbiota in our study. More kinds of probiotics should be studied.
The combined administration of probiotics (B. subtilis and E. faecium) and esomeprazole could reduce the incidence of SIBO and improve abdominal symptoms in patients with RE. It may also prolong the time to relapse, showing the potential of probiotics (B. subtilis and E. faecium) for the treatment and management of RE.
The limitation of this study is the fact that we did not use jejunal cultures for SIBO assessment and did not perform endoscopy on asymptomatic patients after primary healing was achieved. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to study more probiotics and different dosages, and prolong the follow-up time to evaluate the long-term effect.