Published online Dec 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8526
Peer-review started: October 30, 2017
First decision: November 21, 2017
Revised: November 27, 2017
Accepted: December 13, 2017
Article in press: December 13, 2017
Published online: December 28, 2017
Processing time: 60 Days and 0.4 Hours
Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are a common incidental finding and their behaviour in liver transplantation (LT) recipients has not been well studied.
By studying PCNs in the LT setting, we can observe whether the immunosuppressive effects of cirrhosis (pre-LT) and anti-rejection medications (post-LT) have any impact on PCN development and progression. This would provide important information on whether current screening and surveillance for the general population can be safely applied to these patients.
We aimed to determine the prevalence, characteristics and clinical course of PCNs in LT recipients.
Consecutive patients who underwent LT between January 1998 to April 2016 were retrospectively studied. Clinical and laboratory data and imaging findings on computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography were assessed.
The prevalence of PCNs was 3.6% in our cohort of Australian LT patients which is similar to that of the general population. All PCNs were discovered incidentally and over half of PCNs developed post-LT. Only 3/31 (10%) PCNs exhibited worrisome features. All patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) exhibited a benign course in this study while 2/2 mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) (6% of PCNs) patients underwent surgical resection. No cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma occurred in patients with pre-existing PCNs.
This is the first cohort study of PCNs in Australian LT recipients. It is also the first study to describe MCNs in the LT setting. Our results suggest that current surveillance guidelines can likely be safely applied in the LT population. Our data also suggest that awareness and identification of PCNs is increasing with most being identified in the last five years of our study period.
It would be important to pool experience from multiple centers to improve our knowledge of the behavior of non-IPMN PCNs in the context of immunosuppression.