Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2017; 23(39): 7110-7118
Published online Oct 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i39.7110
Short- and long-term results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis
Yuto Watanabe, Rintaro Mikata, Shin Yasui, Hiroshi Ohyama, Harutoshi Sugiyama, Yuji Sakai, Toshio Tsuyuguchi, Naoya Kato
Yuto Watanabe, Rintaro Mikata, Shin Yasui, Hiroshi Ohyama, Harutoshi Sugiyama, Yuji Sakai, Toshio Tsuyuguchi, Naoya Kato, Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo Ward, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
Author contributions: Watanabe Y and Mikata R designed research; Watanabe Y, Mikata R, Yasui S, Ohyama H, Sugiyama H, Sakai Y and Tsuyuguchi T acquired the data; Watanabe Y and Mikata R analyzed and interpreted data; Watanabe Y drafted the manuscript; Mikata R and Kato N made critical revisions related to important intellectual content of the manuscript; all authors have read and approved the final version to be published.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Chiba University Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent statement: In this retrospective study, written informed consent was not provided by the participants, but the documents explaining how the data included in this study would be used were displayed on the bulletin board in Chiba University Hospital.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflicts to disclose. All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Rintaro Mikata, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo Ward, Chiba 260-8670, Japan. mikata@faculty.chiba-u.jp
Telephone: +81-43-2262083 Fax: +81-43-2262088
Received: August 2, 2017
Peer-review started: August 11, 2017
First decision: August 30, 2017
Revised: September 12, 2017
Accepted: September 26, 2017
Article in press: September 26, 2017
Published online: October 21, 2017
Processing time: 79 Days and 18.6 Hours
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

The 2012 Atlanta classification categorized PFC into four types. The revised classification suggests that many PFCs after acute pancreatitis that were treated as pancreatic pseudocyst (PPC) because of slight debris in the cavity should be addressed as walled-off necrosis (WON). Most patients with PPC achieved treatment success by EUS-GTD alone. Although endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) was performed in patients with no clinical improvement by EUS-GTD, serious complications of EN have been reported. However, the criteria for WON that should be treated by EN or other additional treatment remained unclear. Therefore, it is crucial to clarify the cases that can be resolved by EUS-GTD alone and those that should be treated with EN or other treatment in addition to EUS-GTD. Some PFCs develop the recurrent fluid collection in long term. Recommendations of permanent stent placement have been reported to reduce recurrence; however, stent migration or obstruction is concerned. A predictive factor of PFC recurrence should also be clarified.

Research motivation

The treatment success rate of WON by EUS-GTD alone was relatively lower than that of PPC. It is unclear that which patients with WON can be treated by EUS-GTD alone and which ones by EN or other additional treatment including metallic stents. Despite initial treatment success, some PFCs develop the recurrent fluid collection in the long term. It is also unclear which types of PFCs show recurrence.

Research objectives

We aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term results of EUS-GTD for PFC following a revision of the PFC framework by the 2012 Atlanta classification and identify the predictive factors of treatment outcome for WON managed by EUS-GTD alone and predictive factors for recurrence of PFC.

Research methods

The authors retrospectively investigated 103 consecutive patients with PFC who underwent EUS-GTD between September 1999 and August 2015 at Chiba University Hospital. The factors associated with clinical success and recurrence were determined using statistical comparisons. In patients with WON, multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictor variables associated with the treatment success. In addition, PFC recurrence was examined in patients followed up over 6 mo and confirmed internal stent removal after successful EUS-GTD. The optimal cut-off value of the variables that differentiated between recurrence and no recurrence was determined by the receiver-operating characteristic analysis. In addition, area under the curve was calculated. The statistical significance was determined as P < 0.05.

Research results

The treatment success rate of WON, PPC, chronic pseudocyst, and others was 57.5%, 90.9%, 91.0%, and 89.5%, respectively. The treatment success rate of WON was significantly lower in patients with more than 50% pancreatic parenchymal necrosis (OR = 17.0: 95%CI: 1.9-150.7; P = 0.011) and in patients with more than 150 mm of PFC (OR = 27.9; 95%CI: 3.4-227.7; P = 0.002) on contrast-enhanced computed tomography using the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The recurrence of PFC in the long term was 13.3% (median observation time, 38.8 mo). Mean amylase level in the cavity was significantly higher in the recurrence group than in the no recurrence group (P = 0.02). In cases with higher amylase levels in the cavity, transpapillary treatment or prolonged stent placement for more than 6 mo should be considered. However, the timing of stent removal and permanent stent placement remains controversial, and further study is required.

Research conclusions

Reduction of WON by EUS-GTD alone was associated with the proportion of necrotic tissue and the extent of the cavity. Amylase level in the cavity may be a predictive factor for recurrence of PFC.

According to our study, additional treatments, such as EN, should be considered after EUS-GTD in patients with WON with more than 50% parenchymal necrosis and a PFC of more than 150 mm, whereas it may not be needed with under 50% pancreatic parenchymal necrosis and within a PFC of 150 mm.

After successful initial treatment following EUS-GTD for PFC, recurrence of PFC in the long term was higher in patients with higher amylase level in the cavity. This finding indicates the communication of PFC with the pancreatic duct such as chronic pseudocyst or disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome. Therefore, in cases with higher amylase levels in the cavity, transpapillary treatment or prolonged stent placement should be considered.

Research perspectives

In this study, we confirmed that the PFC size and the proportion of pancreatic parenchymal necrosis were related to the resolution of WON treated by EUS-GTD alone. If we can predict treatment outcome of WON by EUS-GTD alone, we might be able to avoid unnecessary invasive therapy or make an earlier decision to perform an additional treatment. Moreover, if we can predict recurrence of PFCs by the amylase level in the cavity, we might be able to reduce the recurrence of PFCs with prolonged stent placement or transpapillary treatment. Prospective studies with larger numbers of patients will be needed to confirm the reliability of these predictive factors.