Esophageal Cancer
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 15, 2003; 9(3): 417-422
Published online Mar 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i3.417
Difference of gene expression profiles between esophageal carcinoma and its pericancerous epithelium by gene chip
Shen-Hua Xu, Li-Juan Qian, Han-Zhou Mou, Chi-Hong Zhu, Xing-Ming Zhou, Xiang-Lin Liu, Yong Chen, Wen-Yu Bao
Shen-Hua Xu, Li-Juan Qian, Han-Zhou Mou, Chi-Hong Zhu, Xiang-Lin Liu, Zhejiang Cancer Research Institute, Hangzhou 310022, China
Xing-Ming Zhou, Department of Surgical, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China
Yong Chen, Wen-Yu Bao, United Gene Scientific Tech. (Group) Company Limited, Shanghai 200092, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by Zhejiang Medical and Health Science Foundation No. 2002A023
Correspondence to: Dr. Shen-Hua Xu, Zhejiang Cancer Research Institute, No.38 Guangji Road, banshan Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China. xsh1947@LoL365.com
Telephone: +86-571-8144401-263 Fax: +86-571-8145807
Received: July 31, 2002
Revised: August 23, 2002
Accepted: September 20, 2002
Published online: March 15, 2003
Abstract

AIM: To study the difference of gene expression between esophageal carcinoma and its pericancerous epithelium and to screen novel associated genes in the early stage of esophageal carcinogenesis by cDNA microarray.

METHODS: Total RNA was extracted with the original single step way from esophageal carcinoma, its pericancerous epithelial tissue and normal esophageal epithelium far from the tumor. The cDNA retro-transcribed from equal quantity of mRNA was labeled with Cy5 and Cy3 fluorescence functioning as probes. The mixed probes were hybridized with two pieces of BioDoor 4096 double dot human whole gene chip. Fluorescence signals were scanned by ScanArray 3000 laser scanner and farther analyzed by ImaGene 3.0 software with the digital computer.

RESULTS: (1) A total of 135 genes were screened out, in which 85 and 50 genes whose the gene expression levels (fluorescence intensity) in esophageal carcinoma were more than 2 times and less than 0.5 times respectively compared with the normal esophageal epithelium. (2) There were also total 31 genes, among then 27 and 4 whose expressions in pericancerous tissue were 2-fold up-regulated and 0.5-fold down-regulated respectively compared with normal esophageal epithelium. (3) There were 13 genes appeared simultaneously in both pericancerous epithelium and esophageal carcinoma, while another 18 genes existed in pericancerous epithelium only.

CONCLUSION: With the parallel comparison among these three gene profiles, it was shown that (1). A total of 135 genes, Whose expression difference manifested as fluorescence intensity were more than 2 times between esophageal carcinoma and normal esophageal epithelium, were probably related to the occurrence and development of the esophageal carcinoma. (2). The 31 genes showing expression difference more than 2 times between pericancerous and normal esophageal epithelium might be relate to the promotion of esophageal pericancerosis and its progress. The present study illustrated that by using the gene chip to detect the difference of gene expression profiles might be of benefit to the gene diagnosis, treatment and prevention of esophageal carcinoma.

Keywords: $[Keywords]