Original Articles
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2000. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 15, 2000; 6(4): 508-512
Published online Aug 15, 2000. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v6.i4.508
Comparison between intravenous and peritoneal route on liver targeted uptake and expression of plasmid delivered by Glyco-poly-L-lysine
Chang-Qing Yang, Ji-Yao Wang, Guo-Ting Fang, Jian-Jun Liu, Jin-Sheng Guo
Chang-Qing Yang, Ji-Yao Wang, Guo-Ting Fang, Jian-Jun Liu, Jin-Sheng Guo, Division of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical University, Shanghai 200032, China
Chang-Qing Yang, male, 35 years old, got his M.D. in 1990 and Ph.D. in 1998 from Xiangya Hospital of Hunan Medical University, now is working as a postdoctoral fellow in Zhongshan Hospital of Shanghai Medical University, majoring in liver targeted uptake and hepatic fibrosis.
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Ji-Yao Wang, Division of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical University, Shanghai 200032, China. xhk@shmu.edu.cn
Telephone: +86-21-64041990 ext 2420 Fax: +86-21-64833680
Received: December 22, 1999
Revised: December 31, 1999
Accepted: January 2, 2000
Published online: August 15, 2000
Abstract

AIM: To compare the effects of intravenous route and peritoneal route on liver targeted uptake and expression of plasmid delivered by galactose-terminal glyco-poly-L-lysine (G-PLL).

METHODS: The plasmid pTM/MMP-1 which could be expressed in eukaryotic cells was bound to G-PLL, and was then transferred into Wistar rats by intra venous and intraperitoneal injection. The expression and distribution of the plasmid were observed at different time periods by in situ hybridization and im munohistochemistry.

RESULTS: The plasmid could be expressed significantly within 24 h a fter being transferred in vivo by both intravenous and intraperitoneal routes. One week later the expression began to decrease, and could still be observed three weeks later. Although both the intravenous and intraperitoneal route could target-specifically deliver the plasmid to the liver, the effect of the former was better as compared to that of the latter.

CONCLUSION: Intravenous route is better for liver targeted uptake and expression of G-PLL-bound plasmids than the peritoneal route.

Keywords: intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection, glyco-poly-L-lysine, lwcr targeted uptake