Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2024; 30(26): 3198-3200
Published online Jul 14, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i26.3198
Non-participation of asymptomatic candidates in screening protocols reduces early diagnosis and worsens prognosis of colorectal cancer
Sergio Pérez-Holanda
Sergio Pérez-Holanda, Office of Regional Viceministry of Health, Regional Viceministry of Health, Oviedo 33005, Asturias, Spain
Author contributions: Pérez-Holanda S write and revise the paper.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Sergio Pérez-Holanda, MD, MSc, PhD, Doctor, Senior Scientist, Surgeon, Surgical Oncologist, Office of Regional Viceministry of Health, Regional Viceministry of Health, C Arturo Álvarez Buylla, Oviedo 33005, Asturias, Spain. perezholandas@gmail.com
Received: March 14, 2024
Revised: May 31, 2024
Accepted: June 18, 2024
Published online: July 14, 2024
Processing time: 117 Days and 1.1 Hours
Abstract

The Agatsuma et al’s study shows that despite the evidence of the benefits of an early colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis, through screening in asymptomatic subjects, up to 50% of candidates reject this option and many of those affected are diagnosed later, in advanced stages. The efficacy of screening programs has been well-established for several years, which reduces the risk of CRC morbidity and mortality, without taking into account the test used for screening, or other tools. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients remain unscreened, so understanding the factors involved, as well as the barriers of the population to adherence is the first step to possibly modify the participation rate. These barriers could include a full range of social and political aspects, especially the type of financial provision of each health service. In Japan, health services are universal, and this advantageous situation makes it easier for citizens to access to these services, contributing to the detection of various diseases, including CRC. Interestingly, the symptomatic CRC group had a lower early-stage diagnosis rate than the patients detected during follow-up for other comorbidities, and symptomatic and cancer screening groups showed similar early-stage diagnosis.

Keywords: Colorectal neoplasms, Cancer registry, Diagnostic route, Cancer screening, Stage at diagnosis

Core Tip: Agatsuma et al’s study used cancer registries from two Japanese hospitals to identify the subgroups that benefit most from screening programs, and clarified the stage at diagnosis in three groups of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients: CRC screening, follow-up (patients detected during follow-up for other comorbidities), and CRC symptomatic. The proportion of early-stage diagnoses was higher in the follow-up group than in the symptomatic group and was comparable to that in the cancer screening group. Therefore, CRC screening should be recommended, especially in patients without regular hospital visits for comorbidities, to improve population participation.