Published online Jun 28, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i24.3022
Revised: May 1, 2024
Accepted: May 27, 2024
Published online: June 28, 2024
Processing time: 113 Days and 14.6 Hours
Managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is becoming increasingly complex and personalized, considering the advent of new advanced therapies with distinct mechanisms of action. Achieving mucosal healing (MH) is a pivotal therapeutic goal in IBD management and can prevent IBD progression and reduce flares, hospitalization, surgery, intestinal damage, and colorectal cancer. Employing proactive disease and therapy assessment is essential to achieve better control of intestinal inflammation, even if subclinical, to alter the natural course of IBD. Periodic monitoring of fecal calprotectin (FC) levels and interval endoscopic evaluations are cornerstones for evaluating response/remission to advanced therapies targeting IBD, assessing MH, and detecting subclinical recurrence. Here, we comment on the article by Ishida et al Moreover, this editorial aimed to review the role of FC and endoscopic scores in predicting MH in patients with IBD. Furthermore, we intend to present some evidence on the role of these markers in future targets, such as histological and transmural healing. Additional prospective multicenter studies with a stricter MH criterion, standardized endoscopic and histopathological analyses, and virtual chromoscopy, potentially including artificial intelligence and other biomarkers, are desired.
Core Tip: Mucosal healing (MH) is a pivotal goal in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management and can prevent IBD relapse. However, assessing MH is challenging due to the poor correlation between symptoms and intestinal inflammation. Fecal calprotectin (FC) levels and interval endoscopic evaluation are cornerstones for achieving this goal. The editorial updates the best predictor tools of IBD relapse in 12 mo concerning FC and endoscopic scores (ESs). In the retrospective single-center study, all three ESs and FC were useful in predicting ulcerative colitis relapse, suggesting the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity as the preferred choice for combining feasibility and accuracy.