Wu YL, Kumar R, Wang MF, Singh M, Huang JF, Zhu YY, Lin S. Validation of conventional non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems in patients with metabolic associated fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(34): 5753-5763 [PMID: 34629799 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i34.5753]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Su Lin, MD, PhD, Associate Chief Physician, Professor, Department of Hepatology, Hepatology Research Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou 350005, Fujian Province, China. sumer5129@fjmu.edu.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2021; 27(34): 5753-5763 Published online Sep 14, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i34.5753
Validation of conventional non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems in patients with metabolic associated fatty liver disease
Yin-Lian Wu, Rahul Kumar, Ming-Fang Wang, Medha Singh, Jiao-Feng Huang, Yue-Yong Zhu, Su Lin
Yin-Lian Wu, Ming-Fang Wang, Jiao-Feng Huang, Yue-Yong Zhu, Su Lin, Department of Hepatology, Hepatology Research Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, Fujian Province, China
Rahul Kumar, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke-NUS academic Medical Centre, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore
Medha Singh, Department of General Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore
Author contributions: Wu YL, Kumar R and Lin S designed the study; Wang MF and Singh M analyzed the data; Huang JF collected the data; Wu YL and Kumar R wrote the paper; Zhu YY and Lin S supervised the study; Wu YL and Kumar R contributed equally to this work; All authors contributed to the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the submission.
Supported byChinese National 13th Five-Year Plan’s Science and Technology Projects, No. 2017ZX10202201.
Institutional review board statement: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University and was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Data sharing statement: Data are available on request.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Su Lin, MD, PhD, Associate Chief Physician, Professor, Department of Hepatology, Hepatology Research Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou 350005, Fujian Province, China. sumer5129@fjmu.edu.cn
Received: January 6, 2021 Peer-review started: January 6, 2021 First decision: May 5, 2021 Revised: May 15, 2021 Accepted: July 29, 2021 Article in press: July 29, 2021 Published online: September 14, 2021 Processing time: 245 Days and 17 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Non-invasive fibrosis scores are not yet validated in the newly defined metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD).
AIM
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of four non-invasive scores including aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio, diabetes score (BARD), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS) in patients with MAFLD.
METHODS
Consecutive patients with histologically confirmed MAFLD were included. The discrimination ability of different non-invasive scores was compared.
RESULTS
A total of 417 patients were included; 156 (37.4%) of them had advanced fibrosis (Metavir ≥ F3). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve of FIB-4, NFS, APRI, and BARD for predicting advanced fibrosis was 0.736, 0.724, 0.671, and 0.609, respectively. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve of FIB-4 and NFS was similar (P = 0.523), while the difference between FIB-4 and APRI (P = 0.001) and FIB-4 and BARD (P < 0.001) was statistically significant. The best thresholds of FIB-4, NFS, APRI, and BARD for diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in MAFLD were 1.05, -2.1, 0.42, and 2. A subgroup analysis showed that FIB-4, APRI, and NFS performed worse in the pure MAFLD group than in the hepatitis B virus-MAFLD group.
CONCLUSION
APRI and BARD scores do not perform well in MAFLD. The FIB-4 and NFS could be more useful, but a new threshold is needed. Novel non-invasive scoring systems for fibrosis are required for MAFLD.
Core Tip: Metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a new concept proposed in 2020 to redefine fatty liver disease. The utility of non-invasive fibrosis scores as well as their optimal thresholds for MAFLD remains unknown. We validated the conventional non-invasive scores including aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, fibrosis-4 index, body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio, diabetes score, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score in patients with MAFLD. The results indicate that the conventional scores may lead to a high rate of misdiagnosis in MAFLD. A novel scoring system for fibrosis is urgently needed.
