Published online Mar 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i9.1035
Peer-review started: December 12, 2017
First decision: January 18, 2018
Revised: January 31, 2018
Accepted: February 8, 2018
Article in press: February 8, 2018
Published online: March 7, 2018
Processing time: 83 Days and 0.4 Hours
To analyze clinical differences between monogenic and nonmonogenic very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD) and to characterize monogenic IBD phenotypically and genotypically via genetic testing.
A retrospective analysis of children aged 0 to 6 years diagnosed with VEO-IBD in a tertiary hospital in southern China from 2005 to 2017 was performed. Clinical data for VEO-IBD patients were collected, and genetic characteristics were analyzed using whole exome sequencing or target gene panel sequencing.
A total of 54 VEO-IBD patients were included in this study. A diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (CD) or CD-like intestinal manifestations accounted for 72.2% of the VEO-IBD cases. Nine patients (16.7%) were identified by genetic testing as having monogenic IBD. The median age of diagnosis in the monogenic group was younger than that of the nonmonogenic IBD group, at 18 mo (interquartile range (IQR): 4 to 78) and 43.5 mo (IQR: 3 to 173), respectively; the P-value was 0.021. The incidence of perianal disease in the monogenic group was higher than that in the nonmonogenic group (P = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between weight-for-age and height-for-age Z-scores between the two groups, and similar laboratory results were obtained for the two groups. Five patients were found to have IL10 receptor mutation, two patients had chronic granulomatous disease, one patient had common variable immunodeficiency disease, and one patient had X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein deficiency.
A high proportion of monogenic IBD was observed in the VEO-IBD group, especially with disease onset before the age of 6 mo. Monogenic IBD and nonmonogenic IBD exhibited similar clinical features. Furthermore, next-generation sequencing played an important role in the diagnosis of monogenic IBD, and IL10 receptor mutation was predominant in this cohort.
Core tip: This study is the largest study to analyze clinical differences between monogenic and nonmonogenic very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD) in China. Moreover, we characterized monogenic IBD phenotypically and genotypically through genetic testing (whole exome sequencing and targeted gene panel sequencing). We found a high proportion of monogenic IBD in the VEO-IBD group, with the most common monogenic IBD being IL10R mutation. Monogenic IBD and nonmonogenic IBD showed similar clinical features. Next-generation sequencing played an important role in the diagnosis of monogenic IBD.