Published online Nov 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i44.7881
Peer-review started: June 2, 2017
First decision: June 20, 2017
Revised: July 11, 2017
Accepted: August 25, 2017
Article in press: August 25, 2017
Published online: November 28, 2017
Processing time: 180 Days and 22.8 Hours
To evaluate the association between mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs) and health disparities.
In this study, we used the GLOBOCAN 2012 database to obtain the cancer incidence and mortality data for 57 countries, and combined this information with the World Health Organization (WHO) rankings and total expenditures on health/gross domestic product (e/GDP). The associations between variables and MIRs were analyzed by linear regression analyses and the 57 countries were selected according to their data quality.
The more developed regions showed high gastric cancer incidence and mortality crude rates, but lower MIR values than the less developed regions (0.64 vs 0.80, respectively). Among six continents, Oceania had the lowest (0.60) and Africa had the highest (0.91) MIR. A good WHO ranking and a high e/GDP were significantly associated with low MIRs (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively).
The MIR variation for gastric cancer would predict regional health disparities.
Core tip: The mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs), defined as the ratio of the crude rate of mortality to the incidence, could reflect the clinical outcomes of disease. A total of 57 countries was included in this analysis to evaluate the association between MIR and health care disparities. The results showed the more developed regions had high gastric cancer incidence and mortality, but lower MIR than the less developed regions. Otherwise, good World Health Organization ranking and high total expenditures on health/gross domestic product were significantly associated with low MIRs. Therefore, the MIR variation for gastric cancer could predict regional health disparities.