Published online Aug 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i29.5371
Peer-review started: December 28, 2016
First decision: Febraury 10, 2017
Revised: May 11, 2017
Accepted: July 4, 2017
Article in press: July 4, 2017
Published online: August 7, 2017
Processing time: 222 Days and 10.4 Hours
To establish consensual definitions of anoperineal lesions of Crohn’s (APLOC) disease and assess interobserver agreement on their diagnosis between experts.
A database of digitally recorded pictures of APLOC was examined by a coordinating group who selected two series of 20 pictures illustrating the various aspects of APLOC. A reading group comprised: eight experts from the Société Nationale Française de Colo Proctologie group of study and research in proctology and one academic dermatologist. All members of the coordinating and reading groups participated in dedicated meetings. The coordinating group initially conducted a literature review to analyse verbatim descriptions used to evaluate APLOC. The study included two phases: establishment of consensual definitions using a formal consensus method and later assessment of interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of APLOC using photos of APLOC, a standardised questionnaire and Fleiss’s kappa test or descriptive statistics.
Terms used in literature to evaluate visible APLOC did not include precise definitions or reference to definitions. Most of the expert reports on the first set of photos agreed with the main diagnosis but their verbatim reporting contained substantial variation. The definitions of ulceration (entity, depth, extension), anal skin tags (entity, inflammatory activity, ulcerated aspect), fistula (complexity, quality of drainage, inflammatory activity of external openings), perianal skin lesions (abscess, papules, edema, erythema) and anoperineal scars were validated. For fistulae, they decided to follow the American Gastroenterology Association’s guidelines definitions. The diagnosis of ulceration (κ = 0.70), fistulae (κ = 0.75), inflammatory activity of external fistula openings (86.6% agreement), abscesses (84.6% agreement) and erythema (100% agreement) achieved a substantial degree of interobserver reproducibility.
This study constructed consensual definitions of APLOC and their characteristics and showed that experts have a fair level of interobserver agreement when using most of the definitions.
Core tip: We present the first study that establishes consensual definitions of anoperineal lesions of Crohn’s disease (APLOC) and assesses interobserver agreement on their diagnosis. With the help of APLOC experts, we conducted this work using a formal consensus method validated by the French National Authority for Health. We herein establish the missing consensual definitions and show that experts have substantial interobserver agreement when using them to diagnose and describe fistulae, ulcerations, activity of external openings and erythema from photos. Even if inspection is only one step in the diagnoses of APLOC, we believe this work will help future studies evaluate if and how treatments influence these lesions.