Topic Highlight
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2016; 22(26): 5927-5935
Published online Jul 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5927
Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Risk factors and preventive methods
Yosuke Kataoka, Yosuke Tsuji, Yoshiki Sakaguchi, Chihiro Minatsuki, Itsuko Asada-Hirayama, Keiko Niimi, Satoshi Ono, Shinya Kodashima, Nobutake Yamamichi, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro, Kazuhiko Koike
Yosuke Kataoka, Yosuke Tsuji, Yoshiki Sakaguchi, Chihiro Minatsuki, Itsuko Asada-Hirayama, Keiko Niimi, Satoshi Ono, Shinya Kodashima, Nobutake Yamamichi, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro, Kazuhiko Koike, Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
Mitsuhiro Fujishiro, Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
Keiko Niimi, Center for Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
Author contributions: Kataoka Y and Tsuji Y contributed to the literature review and manuscript writing; Koike K gave the final approval of the manuscript; All the other authors checked the manuscript and suggested improvement.
Conflict-of-interest statement: Yosuke Tsuji: lecture fees from Olympus Medical Systems, GUNZE and CSL Behring, collaborative research fund from HOYA Pentax; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro: lecture fees from Olympus Medical Systems and CSL Behring, collaborative research fund from HOYA Pentax; the remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Yosuke Tsuji, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan. ytsuji-tky@umin.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-3-38155411 Fax: +81-3-58009522
Received: April 11, 2016
Peer-review started: April 13, 2016
First decision: May 12, 2016
Revised: May 30, 2016
Accepted: June 15, 2016
Article in press: June 15, 2016
Published online: July 14, 2016
Processing time: 85 Days and 18.4 Hours
Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become widely accepted as a standard method of treatment for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms because it enables en block resection even for large lesions or fibrotic lesions with minimal invasiveness, and decreases the local recurrence rate. Moreover, specimens resected in an en block fashion enable accurate histological assessment. Taking these factors into consideration, ESD seems to be more advantageous than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), but the associated risks of perioperative adverse events are higher than in EMR. Bleeding after ESD is the most frequent among these adverse events. Although post-ESD bleeding can be controlled by endoscopic hemostasis in most cases, it may lead to serious conditions including hemorrhagic shock. Even with preventive methods including administration of acid secretion inhibitors and preventive hemostasis, post-ESD bleeding cannot be completely prevented. In addition high-risk cases for post-ESD bleeding, which include cases with the use of antithrombotic agents or which require large resection, are increasing. Although there have been many reports about associated risk factors and methods of preventing post-ESD bleeding, many issues remain unsolved. Therefore, in this review, we have overviewed risk factors and methods of preventing post-ESD bleeding from previous studies. Endoscopists should have sufficient knowledge of these risk factors and preventive methods when performing ESD.

Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Risk factor; Bleeding; Prevention; Antithrombotic agents

Core tip: Antithrombotic agents and large resection are known to be significant risk factors for post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (post-ESD) bleeding, and as the indications for antithrombotic agents increase, and the indications for endoscopic resection are expanded, endoscopists have a chance to face an increasing number of patients with a high risk of post-ESD bleeding. Acid secretion inhibitors and preventive hemostasis are effective for the prevention of post-ESD bleeding, but do not seem to be completely effective in its prevention. Developing additional preventive methods which can reduce post-ESD bleeding more effectively will become an increasingly important issue in the future.