Published online Apr 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i14.3785
Peer-review started: December 10, 2015
First decision: January 13, 2016
Revised: January 19, 2016
Accepted: February 20, 2016
Article in press: February 22, 2016
Published online: April 14, 2016
Processing time: 110 Days and 2.1 Hours
AIM: To analyze characteristics and outcome of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) according to the severity of underlying liver disease.
METHODS: One hundred and sixty-seven adult patients with chronic liver disease and acute deteriorated liver function, defined by jaundice and coagulopathy, were analyzed. Predisposition, type of injury, response, organ failure, and survival were analyzed and compared between patients with non-cirrhosis (type A), cirrhosis (type B) and cirrhosis with previous decompensation (type C).
RESULTS: The predisposition was mostly hepatitis B in type A, while it was alcoholic liver disease in types B and C. Injury was mostly hepatic in type A, but was non-hepatic in type C. Liver failure, defined by CLIF-SOFA, was more frequent in types A and B, and circulatory failure was more frequent in type C. The 30-d overall survival rate (85.3%, 81.1% and 83.7% for types A, B and C, respectively, P = 0.31) and the 30-d transplant-free survival rate (55.9%, 65.5% and 62.5% for types A, B and C, respectively P = 0.33) were not different by ACLF subtype, but 1-year overall survival rate were different (85.3%, 71.7% and 58.7% for types A, B and C, respectively, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: There were clear differences in predisposition, type of injury, accompanying organ failure and long-term mortality according to spectrum of chronic liver disease, implying classifying subtype according to the severity of underlying liver disease is useful for defining, clarifying and comparing ACLF.
Core tip: Controversy exists over defining acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). Recently, multimodal ACLF classification that classifies patients into chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and cirrhosis with previous decompensation has been suggested. We found that the new ACLF classification has clear differences in predisposition, type of injury, accompanying organ failure and long-term outcome by subtype. ACLF patients showed similar high short-term mortality, especially without liver transplantation, according to the subtype, but showed clear difference in the long-term mortality, indicating that the subtyping of ACLF by severity of underlying liver disease is useful.