Published online Mar 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i9.2683
Peer-review started: July 1, 2014
First decision: August 6, 2014
Revised: August 25, 2014
Accepted: October 15, 2014
Article in press: October 15, 2014
Published online: March 7, 2015
Processing time: 251 Days and 20.2 Hours
AIM: To study how lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk is stratified in undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (undiff-EGC) dependent on combinations of risk factors.
METHODS: Five hundred and sixty-seven cases with undiff-EGC undergoing gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy were examined retrospectively. Using clinicopathological factors of patient age, location, size, an endoscopic macroscopic tumor form, ulceration, depth, histology, lymphatic involvement (LI) and venous involvement (VI), LNM risk was examined and stratified by conventional statistical analysis and data-mining analysis.
RESULTS: LNM was positive in 44 of 567 cases (7.8%). Univariate analysis revealed > 2 cm, protrusion, submucosal (sm), mixed type, LI and VI as significant prognostic factors and > 2 cm and LI-positive were independent factors by multivariate analysis. In preoperatively evaluable factors excluding LVI, sm and > 2 cm were independent factors. According to the depth and size, cases were categorized into the low-risk group [m and ≤ 2 cm, 0% (LNM incidence)], the moderate-risk group (m and > 2 cm, 5.6%; and sm and ≤ 2 cm, 6.0%), and the high-risk group (sm and > 2 cm, 19.3%). On the other hand, LNM occurred in 1.4% in all LI-negative cases, greatly lower than 28.2% in all LI-positive cases, and LNM incidence was low in LI-negative cases even in the moderate- and high-risk groups.
CONCLUSION: LNM-related factors in undiff-EGC were depth and size preoperatively while those were LI and size postoperatively. Among these factors, LI was the most significantly correlated factor.
Core tip: The lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk in cases with undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer was evaluated and stratified using preoperatively as well as postoperatively evaluable factors. In preoperatively evaluable factors, the risk of LNM was predicted based on the size and depth and categorized into the low-risk group: mucosal cancer (m) and ≤ 2 cm, 0% (LNM incidence) (95%CI: 0-2.3), the moderate-risk group: m and > 2 cm, 5.6% (95%CI: 2.6-11.7); submucosal invasion (sm) and ≤ 2 cm, 6.0% (95%CI: 3.2-11.1), and the high-risk group: sm and > 2 cm, 19.3% (95%CI: 13.8-26.4). However, when the postoperatively evaluable factor of LI was included, cases with further lower or higher risk could be stratified even in the moderate- and high-risk groups. Some high-risk cases for surgery due to old age and concurrent disease could be reasonably followed-up after resection of the gastric lesion by endoscopic submucosal dissection.