Published online Feb 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1636
Peer-review started: June 28, 2014
First decision: July 21, 2014
Revised: August 9, 2014
Accepted: September 19, 2014
Article in press: September 19, 2014
Published online: February 7, 2015
Processing time: 227 Days and 4 Hours
AIM: To evaluate whether the application of sorafenib during the peri-operative period of liver transplantation improves prognosis in liver cancer patients.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and MEDLINE for eligible articles. A total of 4 studies were found that fulfilled the previously agreed-upon standards. We then performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the enrolled trials that met the inclusion criteria.
RESULTS: Out of the 104 studies identified in the database, 82 were not clinical experiments, and 18 did not fit the inclusion standards. Among the remaining 4 articles, only 1 was related to the preoperative use of sorafenib, whereas the other 3 were related to its postoperative use. As the heterogeneity among the 4 studies was high, with an I2 of 86%, a randomized effect model was applied to pool the data. The application of sorafenib before liver transplantation had a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.29 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.33-32.56. The use of sorafenib after liver transplantation had an HR of 1.44 (95%CI: 0.27-7.71). The overall pooled HR was 1.68 (95%CI: 0.41-6.91).
CONCLUSION: The results showed that the use of sorafenib during the peri-operative period of liver transplantation did not improve patient survival significantly. In fact, sorafenib could even lead to a worse prognosis, as its use may increase the hazard of poor survival.
Core tip: The data were extracted from the Kaplan-Meier curves of every study identified and then input into a hazard ratio calculation spreadsheet. The HRs generated from the sheet were combined with RevMan5.0. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis assessing the use of sorafenib in the peri-operative period of liver transplantation.