Published online Oct 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11481
Peer-review started: May 29, 2015
First decision: June 19, 2015
Revised: July 15, 2015
Accepted: September 14, 2015
Article in press: September 15, 2015
Published online: October 28, 2015
Processing time: 149 Days and 19 Hours
AIM: To meta-analyze published data about the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the evaluation of primary tumor in patients with gallbladder cancer (GBCa).
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of studies published through 30th June 2014 regarding the role of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the evaluation of primary gallbladder cancer (GBCa) was performed. All retrieved studies were reviewed. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT in the evaluation of primary GBCa were calculated. The area under the summary receiving operator characteristics curve (AUC) was calculated to measure the accuracy of these methods. Sub-analyses considering the device used (PET vs PET/CT) were carried out.
RESULTS: Twenty-one studies comprising 495 patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for suspicious GBCa were selected for the systematic review. The meta-analysis of 13 selected studies provided the following results: sensitivity 87% (95%CI: 82%-92%), specificity 78% (95%CI: 68%-86%). The AUC was 0.88. Improvement of sensitivity and specificity was observed when PET/CT was used.
CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG-PET and PET/CT demonstrated to be useful diagnostic imaging methods in the assessment of primary tumor in GBCa patients, nevertheless possible sources of false-negative and false-positive results should be kept in mind. PET/CT seems to have a better diagnostic accuracy than PET alone in this setting.
Core tip: Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (CT) demonstrated to be useful diagnostic imaging methods in the assessment of primary tumor in gallbladder carcinoma patients, nevertheless possible sources of false-negative and false-positive results should be kept in mind. PET/CT seems to have a better diagnostic accuracy than PET alone in this setting.