Published online Jan 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.12
Peer-review started: August 11, 2014
First decision: August 27, 2014
Revised: October 6, 2014
Accepted: November 7, 2014
Article in press: November 11, 2014
Published online: January 7, 2015
Processing time: 178 Days and 10.1 Hours
Ideal surgical treatment for anal fistula should aim to eradicate sepsis and promote healing of the tract, whilst preserving the sphincters and the mechanism of continence. For the simple and most distal fistulae, conventional surgical options such as laying open of the fistula tract seem to be relatively safe and therefore, well accepted in clinical practise. However, for the more complex fistulae where a significant proportion of the anal sphincter is involved, great concern remains about damaging the sphincter and subsequent poor functional outcome, which is quite inevitable following conventional surgical treatment. For this reason, over the last two decades, many sphincter-preserving procedures for the treatment of anal fistula have been introduced with the common goal of minimising the injury to the anal sphincters and preserving optimal function. Among them, the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure appears to be safe and effective and may be routinely considered for complex anal fistula. Another technique, the anal fistula plug, derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa, is safe but modestly effective in long-term follow-up, with success rates varying from 24%-88%. The failure rate may be due to its extrusion from the fistula tract. To obviate that, a new designed plug (GORE BioA®) was introduced, but long term data regarding its efficacy are scant. Fibrin glue showed poor and variable healing rate (14%-74%). FiLaC and video-assisted anal fistula treatment procedures, respectively using laser and electrode energy, are expensive and yet to be thoroughly assessed in clinical practise. Recently, a therapy using autologous adipose-derived stem cells has been described. Their properties of regenerating tissues and suppressing inflammatory response must be better investigated on anal fistulae, and studies remain in progress. The aim of this present article is to review the pertinent literature, describing the advantages and limitations of new sphincter-preserving techniques.
Core tip: We present a review with a critical appraisal on the modern procedures for anal fistula which aims to the common goal of minimising the injury to the anal sphincters whilst preserving optimal function. We found the following ones as the most representative: Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, anal fistula plug derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa and the new designed GORE BioA® plug, fibrin glue, fistula laser closure, video-assisted anal fistula treatment and adipose-derived stem cells. We examined the advantages and drawbacks for each procedure through the outcomes reported in literature.