Published online Oct 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13791
Revised: April 18, 2014
Accepted: May 26, 2014
Published online: October 14, 2014
Processing time: 229 Days and 17.4 Hours
The high incidence of gastric cancer (GC) and its consequent mortality rate severely threaten human health. GC is frequently not diagnosed until a relatively advanced stage. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment. Thus, early screening and diagnosis are critical for improving prognoses in patients with GC. Gastroscopy with biopsy is an appropriate method capable of aiding the diagnosis of specific early GC tumor types; however, the stress caused by this method together with it being excessively expensive makes it difficult to use it as a routine method for screening for GC on a population basis. The currently used tumor marker assays for detecting GC are simple and rapid, but their use is limited by their low sensitivity and specificity. In recent years, several markers have been identified and tested for their clinical relevance in the management of GC. Here, we review the serum-based tumor markers for GC and their clinical significance, focusing on discoveries from microarray/proteomics research. We also review tissue-based GC tumor markers and their clinical application, focusing on discoveries from immunohistochemical research. This review provides a brief description of various tumor markers for the purposes of diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutics, and we include markers already in clinical practice and various forthcoming biomarkers.
Core tip: Serum-based gastric cancer tumor markers and their clinical significance or application are discussed. Serum-based carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 and tissue-based human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/Neu are potential tumor markers for various types of gastrointestinal cancer. This review provides a brief description of various tumor markers for the purposes of diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutics, and we include markers already in clinical practice and various forthcoming biomarkers. Hopefully, based on the markers, we will generate accurate diagnoses, prognoses and select the most appropriate therapy.