Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2014; 20(34): 12330-12340
Published online Sep 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i34.12330
Efficacy of immunosuppression monotherapy after liver transplantation: A meta-analysis
Xiang Lan, Meng-Gang Liu, Hong-Xu Chen, Hong-Ming Liu, Wei Zeng, Dong Wei, Ping Chen
Xiang Lan, Meng-Gang Liu, Hong-Xu Chen, Hong-Ming Liu, Wei Zeng, Dong Wei, Ping Chen, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
Author contributions: Lan X and Liu MG contributed equally to this study; all authors contributed to the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Dr. Ping Chen, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Daping Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, 10 Changjiang Branch Road, Daping, Chongqing 400042, China. chenping10701@hotmail.com
Telephone: +86-23-68757966 Fax: +86-23-68757966
Received: January 1, 2014
Revised: February 17, 2014
Accepted: April 28, 2014
Published online: September 14, 2014
Processing time: 260 Days and 0.3 Hours
Abstract

AIM: To assess the advantages and disadvantages of immunosuppression monotherapy after transplantation and the impact of monotherapy on hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence.

METHODS: Articles from Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded, including non-English literature identified in these databases, were searched up to January 2013. We included randomized clinical trials comparing various immunosuppression monotherapy and prednisone-based immunosuppression combinations for liver transplantation. The modified Jadad scale score or the Oxford quality scoring system was used. Meta-analyses were performed with weighted random-effects models.

RESULTS: A total of 14 randomized articles including 1814 patients were identified. Eight trials including 1214 patients compared tacrolimus monotherapy (n = 610) vs tacrolimus plus steroids or triple therapy regarding acute rejection and adverse events (n = 604). Five trials, including 285 patients, compared tacrolimus monotherapy (n = 143) vs tacrolimus plus steroids or triple therapy regarding hepatitis C recurrence (n = 142). Four trials including 273 patients compared cyclosporine monotherapy (n = 148) vs cyclosporine and steroids regarding acute rejection and adverse events (n = 125). Two trials including 170 patients compared mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy (n = 86) vs combinations regarding acute rejection (n = 84). There were no significant differences in the acute rejection rates between tacrolimus monotherapy (RR = 1.04, P = 0.620), and cyclosporine monotherapy (RR = 0.89, P = 0.770). Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy had a significant increase in the acute rejection rate (RR = 4.50, P = 0.027). Tacrolimus monotherapy had no significant effects on the recurrence of hepatitis C (RR = 1.03, P = 0.752). More cytomegalovirus infection (RR = 0.48, P = 0.000) and drug-related diabetes mellitus (RR = 0.54, P = 0.000) were observed in the immunosuppression combination therapy groups.

CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus and cyclosporine monotherapy may be as effective as immunosuppression combination therapy. Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy was not considerable. Tacrolimus monotherapy does not increase recurrence of HCV.

Keywords: Liver transplantation; Immunosuppression monotherapy; Cytomegalovirus; Diabetes; Meta-analysis

Core tip: Immunosuppression is used to reduce rejection after liver transplantation. There is considerable controversy regarding whether an immunosuppression monotherapy should be used after transplantation. To assess the advantages (lower adverse events such as hypertension) and disadvantages (more episodes of rejection) of immunosuppression monotherapy after transplantation. To assess the impact of immunosuppression monotherapy on recurrence of hepatitis C.