Case Control Study
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2014; 20(12): 3369-3375
Published online Mar 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3369
Analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes of gastric cancer in younger patients: A case control study using propensity score methods
Ki-Han Kim, Yoo-Min Kim, Min-Chan Kim, Ghap-Joong Jung
Ki-Han Kim, Yoo-Min Kim, Min-Chan Kim, Ghap-Joong Jung, Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan 602-715, South Korea
Author contributions: Kim KH and Kim MC contributed equally to this work; Kim KH designed the report and wrote the manuscript; Kim KH and Kim YM acquired the data; Kim KH and Kim MC analyzed and interpreted the data; Kim MC and Jung GJ provided the final approval of the version to be published.
Supported by The Dong-A University Research Fund
Correspondence to: Min Chan Kim, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, 3-1 Dongdaeshin-Dong, Seo-Gu, Busan 602-715, South Korea. mckim@donga.ac.kr
Telephone: +82-51-2402643 Fax: +82-51-2479316
Received: September 22, 2013
Revised: November 18, 2013
Accepted: January 6, 2014
Published online: March 28, 2014
Abstract

AIM: To understand the clinicopathological and prognostic features of gastric cancer in younger and older patients.

METHODS: Between January 2002 and December 2008, 1667 patients underwent curative gastric surgery. For comparative purposes, the patients were divided into two groups: younger patients who were less than 40 years old (112 patients), and older patients who were 40 years old and older (1555 patients). In both groups, propensity scoring methods were used to select patients with similar disease statuses. A total of 224 matched cases, with 112 patients in each group, were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS: Compared to the older group, the younger group with gastric cancer had a significantly higher percentage of females (P = 0.007), poorly differentiated or signet ring cell carcinoma (P < 0.001), advanced T stage gastric cancer (P = 0.045), and advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage cancer (P = 0.036). The older group with gastric cancer had more comorbidities (P < 0.001). With the exception of the number of lymph node dissection (P < 0.001) and retrieved lymph node (P = 0.010), there were no statistically significant differences between the postoperative outcomes of the two groups. During the follow-up period, there were 19 recurrences in the younger group and 11 recurrences in the older group. The overall five-year survival rates in the younger and older groups were 84.3% and 89.6%, respectively (P = 0.172). There were no significant differences (P = 0.238) in the overall survival of patients with advanced T stage gastric cancer in the two groups, with five-year survival rates of 70.8% in the younger group and 79.5% in the older group. With regard to the age-adjusted survival rate, there was significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.225).

CONCLUSION: In spite of aggressive cancer patterns in the younger group with gastric cancer, the younger group did not have a worse prognosis than the older group in our study.

Keywords: Gastric cancer, Younger patients, Prognosis

Core tip: In this study, propensity scoring methods were used to select patients with similar disease statuses. A total of 224 matched cases (112 patients in each group) were included in the analysis. The younger group with gastric cancer had more aggressive patterns than did the older group. The overall five-year survival rates between the younger and older groups were not significantly different. While there were more cases of aggressive cancer patterns in the younger group, early diagnosis and curative resections improved the prognosis and patient survival; the younger group with gastric cancer did not show a worse prognosis than the older group.