Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2013; 19(4): 511-515
Published online Jan 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.511
Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation in the surgical treatment of duodenal and peri-ampullary adenomas
Lilian C Azih, Brett L Broussard, Milind A Phadnis, Martin J Heslin, Mohamad A Eloubeidi, Shayam Varadarajulu, Juan Pablo Arnoletti
Lilian C Azih, Brett L Broussard, Department of General Surgery, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, United States
Milind A Phadnis, Department of Biostatistics, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States
Martin J Heslin, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, United States
Mohamad A Eloubeidi, Department of Gastroenterology, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
Shayam Varadarajulu, Department of Gastroenterology, the Center for Specialized Surgery at Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL 32804, United States
Juan Pablo Arnoletti, Department of Surgical Oncology, The Center for Specialized Surgery at Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL 32804, United States
Author contributions: Azih LC and Arnoletti JP designed research; Azih LC, Arnoletti JP, Broussard BL, Phadnis MA and Varadarajulu S analyzed data; Azih LC, Arnoletti JP, Heslin MJ, Eloubeidi MA and Varadarajulu S contributed new ideas to analyzing data for clinical application to research; Azih LC and Arnoletti JP wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Lilian C Azih, MD, Department of General Surgery, General Surgery Resident, University of Alabama Birmingham, 1922 3rd Avenue South KB 217, Birmingham, AL 35233, United States. lazih@uab.edu
Telephone: +1-404-3746085 Fax: +1-407-3037305
Received: June 11, 2012
Revised: September 28, 2012
Accepted: October 22, 2012
Published online: January 28, 2013
Abstract

AIM: To investigate endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for predicting depth of mucosal invasion and to analyze outcomes following endoscopic and transduodenal resection.

METHODS: Records of 111 patients seen at our institution from November 1999 to July 2011 with the post-operative pathological diagnosis of benign ampullary and duodenal adenomas were reviewed. Records of patients who underwent preoperative EUS for diagnostic purposes were identified. The accuracy of EUS in predicting the absence of muscular invasion was assessed by comparing EUS reports to the final surgical pathological results. In addition, the incidence of the post-operative complications over a period of 30 d and the subsequent long-term outcome (recurrence) over a period of 30 mo associated with endoscopic and transduodenal surgical resection was recorded, compared and analyzed.

RESULTS: Among 111 patients with benign ampullary and duodenal adenomas, 47 underwent preoperative EUS for 29 peri-ampullary lesions and 18 duodenal lesions. In addition, computed tomography was performed in 18 patients, endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in 10 patients and esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 22 patients. There were 43 patients with sporadic adenomas and 4 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)/other polyposis syndromes. In 38 (81%, P < 0.05) patients, EUS reliably identified absence of submucosal and muscularis invasion. In 4 cases, EUS underestimated submucosal invasion that was proven by pathology. In the other 5 patients, EUS predicted muscularis invasion which could not be demonstrated in the resected specimen. EUS predicted tumor muscularis invasion with a specificity of 88% and negative predictive value of 90% (P < 0.05). Types of resection performed included endoscopic resection in 22 cases, partial duodenectomy in 9 cases, transduodenal ampullectomy with sphincteroplasty in 10 cases and pancreaticoduodenectomy in 6 cases. The main post-operative final pathological results included villous adenoma (n = 5), adenoma (n = 8), tubulovillous adenoma (n = 10), tubular adenoma (n = 20) and hyperplastic polyp (n = 2). Among the 47 patients who underwent resection, 8 (17%, 5 of which corresponded to surgical resection) developed post-procedural complications which included retroperitoneal hematoma, intra-abdominal abscess, wound infection, delayed gastric emptying and prolonged ileus. After median follow-up of 20 mo there were 6 local recurrences (13%, median follow-up = 20 mo) 4 of which were in patients with FAP.

CONCLUSION: EUS accurately predicts the depth of mucosal invasion in suspected benign ampullary and duodenal adenomas. These patients can safely undergo endoscopic or local resection.

Keywords: Endoscopic ultrasound; Duodenal periampullary adenoma; Esophagogastroduodenoscopy; Cholangio-pancreatography