Original Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2013; 19(33): 5464-5472
Published online Sep 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i33.5464
Extracorporeal continuous portal diversion plus temporal plasmapheresis for “small-for-size” syndrome
Peng Hou, Chao Chen, Yu-Liang Tu, Zi-Man Zhu, Jing-Wang Tan
Peng Hou, Chao Chen, Institute of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100037, China
Yu-Liang Tu, Zi-Man Zhu, Jing-Wang Tan, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100037, China
Author contributions: Hou P and Chen C contributed equally to this work; Hou P and Chen C performed the majority of experiments; Tu YL and Zhu ZM provided vital reagents and analytical tools and revised the manuscript; Tan JW designed the study and wrote the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Jing-Wang Tan, Professor, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100037, China. tanjingwang02@yahoo.com.cn
Telephone: +86-10-68486829 Fax: +86-10-68486829
Received: February 24, 2013
Revised: June 14, 2013
Accepted: June 28, 2013
Published online: September 7, 2013
Processing time: 196 Days and 18.1 Hours
Abstract

AIM: To investigate the effect of plasmapheresis via the portal vein for “small-for-size” syndrome (SFSS) aided by extracorporeal continuous portal diversion (ECPD).

METHODS: Extensive or total hepatectomy in the pig is usually adopted as a postoperative liver failure (PLF) or SFSS model. In this study, animals which underwent 85%-90% hepatectomy were randomized into either the Systemic group (n = 7) or the Portal group (n = 7). In the Systemic group, all pigs received temporal plasmapheresis (PP) via the extracorporeal catheter circuit (systemic to systemic circulation) from 24 to 30 h post-hepatectomy (PH); in the Portal group, all pigs received ECPD to divert partial portal vein flow (PVF) to the systemic circulation after hepatectomy, then converted to temporal PP from 24 to 30 h PH, and subsequently converted to ECPD again until 48 h PH. In the Portal group, the PVF was preserved at 3.0-3.3 times that of the baseline value, similar to that following 70% hepatectomy, which was regarded as the optimal PVF to the hypertrophic liver remnant. At 48 h PH, all pigs were re-opened and the portal vein pressure (PVP), PVF, and HAF (hepatic artery flow) were measured, and then diversion of the portal venous flow was terminated. After 1 h the PVP, PVF, and HAF were re-measured. The portal hemodynamic changes, liver injury, liver regeneration and bacterial/lipopolysaccharide (LPS) translocation were evaluated in the two groups.

RESULTS: The PVP in the Portal group was significantly lower than that in the Systemic group during the time period from 2 to 49 h PH (P < 0.05). Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin (TB) and ammonia were significantly reduced in the Portal group compared with the Systemic group from 24 to 48 h PH (P < 0.05). The Portal group may have attenuated sinusoidal endothelial injury and decreased the level of HA compared with the Systemic group. In the Systemic group, there was significant sinusoidal dilation, hydropic changes in hepatocytes and hemorrhage into the hepatic parenchyma, and the sinusoidal endothelial lining was partially destroyed and detached into the sinusoidal space. CD31 immunostaining revealed significant destruction of the endothelial lining. In the Portal group, there was no intraparenchymal hemorrhage and the sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatocytes were well preserved. CD31 immunostaining was mild which indicated less destruction of the endothelial lining. HA was significantly decreased in the Portal group compared with the Systemic group from 2 to 48 h PH. The rate of liver remnant regeneration was elevated, while apoptosis was attenuated in the Portal group compared with the Systemic group. Thymidine kinase activity was much higher in the Portal group than in the Systemic group at 48 h PH. The PCNA index was significantly increased and the apoptotic index was significantly decreased in the Portal group compared with the Systemic group. Bacterial translocation and endotoxin, as well as the inflammatory response, were significantly attenuated in the Portal group compared with the Systemic group. LPS, tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 levels were all significantly decreased in the Portal group compared with the Systemic group from 24 to 48 h PH, while bacterial DNA level was significantly decreased from 2 to 48 h PH.

CONCLUSION: PP plus ECPD via the portal vein can attenuate toxic load and hyperperfusion injury, and should be undertaken instead of PP via the systemic circulation in SFSS or PLF.

Keywords: Small-for-size syndrome; Postoperative liver failure; Extracorporeal portal diversion; Plasmapheresis; Hepatectomy

Core tip: Plasmapheresis (PP) and other artificial liver support (ALS) modalities have been used to treat postoperative liver failure (PLF) and “small-for-size” syndrome (SFSS). However, these modalities did not result in a significant improvement in survival. It is thought that these modalities cannot relieve portal hypertension, thus are inefficacious. This study demonstrated that ECPD plus temporal PP via the portal vein can not only dynamically turn the portal flow to the systematic circulation and attenuate portal overflow injury, but also reduces toxic load. This technique should be undertaken instead of PP or ALS via the systemic circulation in SFSS or PLF, and shows potential for clinical application.