Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2012; 18(46): 6764-6770
Published online Dec 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6764
Impact of minimally invasive surgery on the treatment of benign esophageal disorders
Brian Bello, Fernando A Herbella, Marco E Allaix, Marco G Patti
Brian Bello, Fernando A Herbella, Marco E Allaix, Marco G Patti, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
Author contributions: Bello B, Herbella FA, Allaix ME and Patti MG contributed equally to the conception and design of this work; Bello B, Herbella FA, Allaix ME and Patti MG drafted and revised the article; all authors approved the final version to be published.
Correspondence to: Marco G Patti, MD, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, 5841 South Maryland Ave, MC 5031, Room G-201, Chicago, IL 60637, United States. mpatti@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu
Telephone: +1-773-7024763 Fax: +1-773-8343204
Received: April 18, 2012
Revised: May 26, 2012
Accepted: July 18, 2012
Published online: December 14, 2012
Abstract

Thanks to the development of minimally invasive surgery, the last 20 years have witnessed a change in the treatment algorithm of benign esophageal disorders. Today a laparoscopic operation is the treatment of choice for esophageal achalasia and for most patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Because the pathogenesis of achalasia is unknown, treatment is palliative and aims to improve esophageal emptying by decreasing the functional obstruction at the level of the gastro-esophageal junction. The refinement of minimally invasive techniques accompanied by large, multiple randomized control trials with long-term outcome has allowed the laparoscopic Heller myotomy and partial fundoplication to become the treatment of choice for achalasia compared to endoscopic procedures, including endoscopic botulinum toxin injection and pneumatic dilatation. Patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux need to undergo a thorough preoperative workup. After establishing diagnosis, treatment for gastroesophageal reflux should be individualized to patient characteristics and a decision about an operation made jointly between surgeon and patient. The indications for surgery have changed in the last twenty years. In the past, surgery was often considered for patients who did not respond well to acid reducing medications. Today, the best candidate for surgery is the patient who has excellent control of symptoms with proton pump inhibitors. The minimally invasive approach to antireflux surgery has allowed surgeons to control reflux in a safe manner, with excellent long term outcomes. Like achalasia and gastroesophageal reflux, the treatment of patients with paraesophageal hernias has also seen a major evolution. The laparoscopic approach has been shown to be safe, and durable, with good relief of symptoms over the long-term. The most significant controversy with laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair is the optimal crural repair. This manuscript reviews the evolution of these techniques.

Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Esophageal achalasia; Hiatal hernia; Laparoscopic fundoplication; Laparoscopic Heller myotomy