Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2012; 18(46): 6712-6719
Published online Dec 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6712
Thinking in three's: Changing surgical patient safety practices in the complex modern operating room
Verna C Gibbs
Verna C Gibbs, Department of Surgery, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94121, United States
Author contributions: Gibbs VC designed project, analyzed data and wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Verna C Gibbs, MD, Department of Surgery, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, SFVAMC (112) 4150 Clement Str., San Francisco, CA 94121, United States. verna.gibbs@va.gov
Telephone: +1-415-2214810 Fax: +1-415-7502181
Received: April 17, 2012
Revised: September 23, 2012
Accepted: September 29, 2012
Published online: December 14, 2012
Abstract

The three surgical patient safety events, wrong site surgery, retained surgical items (RSI) and surgical fires are rare occurrences and thus their effects on the complex modern operating room (OR) are difficult to study. The likelihood of occurrence and the magnitude of risk for each of these surgical safety events are undefined. Many providers may never have a personal experience with one of these events and training and education on these topics are sparse. These circumstances lead to faulty thinking that a provider won’t ever have an event or if one does occur the provider will intuitively know what to do. Surgeons are not preoccupied with failure and tend to usually consider good outcomes, which leads them to ignore or diminish the importance of implementing and following simple safety practices. These circumstances contribute to the persistent low level occurrence of these three events and to the difficulty in generating sufficient interest to resource solutions. Individual facilities rarely have the time or talent to understand these events and develop lasting solutions. More often than not, even the most well meaning internal review results in a new line to a policy and some rigorous enforcement mandate. This approach routinely fails and is another reason why these problems are so persistent. Vigilance actions alone have been unsuccessful so hospitals now have to take a systematic approach to implementing safer processes and providing the resources for surgeons and other stakeholders to optimize the OR environment. This article discusses standardized processes of care for mitigation of injury or outright prevention of wrong site surgery, RSI and surgical fires in an action-oriented framework illustrating the strategic elements important in each event and focusing on the responsibilities for each of the three major OR agents-anesthesiologists, surgeons and nurses. A Surgical Patient Safety Checklist is discussed that incorporates the necessary elements to bring these team members together and influence the emergence of a safer OR.

Keywords: Complex adaptive systems; Wrong site surgery; Retained surgical items; Retained foreign objects; Retained foreign bodies; Surgical patient safety; Surgical fires; Safety checklist