Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2012; 18(36): 5106-5113
Published online Sep 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i36.5106
Quality of life after three kinds of esophagectomy for cancer
Jian Zeng, Jin-Shi Liu
Jian Zeng, Jin-Shi Liu, Department of Thoracic Tumor Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310004, Zhejiang Province, China
Author contributions: Zeng J designed the research; Liu JS contributed analytic tools; Zeng J and Liu JS analyzed the data; and Zeng J wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Dr. Jian Zeng, Attending Doctor, Department of Thoracic Tumor Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310004, Zhejiang Province, China. jjhwwyqsw@163.com
Telephone: +86-571-86889013 Fax: +86-571-88145807
Received: January 12, 2012
Revised: May 8, 2012
Accepted: May 13, 2012
Published online: September 28, 2012
Abstract

AIM: To evaluate quality of life (QOL) following Ivor Lewis, left transthoracic, and combined thoracoscopic/laparoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS: Ninety patients with esophageal cancer were assigned to Ivor Lewis (n = 30), combined thoracoscopic/laparoscopic (n = 30), and left transthoracic (n = 30) esophagectomy groups. The QOL-core 30 questionnaire and the supplemental QOL-esophageal module 18 questionnaire for patients with esophageal cancer, both developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, were used to evaluate patients’ QOL from 1 wk before to 24 wk after surgery.

RESULTS: A total of 324 questionnaires were collected from 90 patients; 36 postoperative questionnaires were not completed because patients could not be contacted for follow-up visits. QOL declined markedly in all patients at 1 wk postoperatively: preoperative and 1-wk postoperative global QOL scores in the Ivor Lewis, combined thoracoscopic/laparoscopic, and left transthoracic groups were 80.8 ± 9.3 vs 32.0 ± 16.1 (P < 0.001), 81.1 ± 9.0 vs 53.3 ± 11.5 (P < 0.001), and 83.6 ± 11.2 vs 46.4 ± 11.3 (P < 0.001), respectively. Thereafter, QOL recovered gradually in all patients. Patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy showed the most pronounced decline in QOL; global scores were lower in this group than in the combined thoracoscopic/laparoscopic (P < 0.001) and left transthoracic (P < 0.001) groups at 1 wk postoperatively and was not restored to the preoperative level at 24 wk postoperatively. QOL declined least in patients undergoing combined thoracoscopic/laparoscopic esophagectomy, and most indices had recovered to preoperative levels at 24 wk postoperatively. In the Ivor Lewis and combined thoracoscopic/laparoscopic groups, pain and physical function scores were 78.9 ± 18.5 vs 57.8 ± 19.9 (P < 0.001) and 59.3 ± 16.1 vs 70.2 ± 19.2 (P = 0.02), respectively, at 1 wk postoperatively and 26.1 ± 28.6 vs 9.5 ± 15.6 (P = 0.007) and 88.4 ± 10.5 vs 95.8 ± 7.3 (P = 0.003), respectively, at 24 wk postoperatively. Scores in the left transthoracic esophagectomy group fell between those of the other two groups.

CONCLUSION: Compared with Ivor Lewis and left transthoracic esophagectomies, combined thoracoscopic/laparoscopic esophagectomy enables higher postoperative QOL, making it a preferable surgical approach for esophageal cancer.

Keywords: Esophageal cancer; Quality of life; Thoracoscope; Laparoscope; Esophagectomy