Letters To The Editor
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2012; 18(26): 3477-3478
Published online Jul 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3477
Endoscopic diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus
Tomoyuki Akiyama, Yusuke Sekino, Hiroshi Iida, Shigeru Koyama, Eiji Gotoh, Shin Maeda, Atsushi Nakajima, Masahiko Inamori
Tomoyuki Akiyama, Shigeru Koyama, Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital, Tokyo 150-0013, Japan
Yusuke Sekino, Hiroshi Iida, Shin Maeda, Atsushi Nakajima, Masahiko Inamori, Gastroenterology Division, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama 2360004, Japan
Eiji Gotoh, Department of Medical Education, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 2360004, Japan
Masahiko Inamori, Office of Postgraduate Medical Education, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama 2360004, Japan
Author contributions: Akiyama T and Inamori M designed the study; Koyama S, Gotoh E, Maeda S and Nakajima A were responsible for data analysis; Sekino Y and Iida H contributed new reagents/analytical tools; Akiyama T and Inamori M wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Masahiko Inamori, MD, PhD, Gastroenterology Division, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 2360004, Japan. inamorim@med.yokohama-cu.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-45-7872640 Fax: +81-45-7843546
Received: January 5, 2012
Revised: April 17, 2012
Accepted: April 20, 2012
Published online: July 14, 2012
Abstract

The Prague C and M Criteria have been developed for the objective endoscopic diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus (BE). BE arises between the squamocolumnar junction and the gastroesophageal junction at the proximal margin of the gastric folds. In this study, we reported that 43.0% of the subjects examined were diagnosed with BE based on the Prague C and M Criteria. Previous criticism by John Dent proposed that our data should be considered invalid because the prevalence of BE reported in our study was extraordinarily high and discordant with previous studies. Dent predicted that the position of the gastroesophageal junction in our study was judged to be lower than the actual position due to the effacement of the proximal ends of the gastric folds because of the routine use of a high degree of air distension during typical Japanese endoscopic examinations. The endoscopic evaluation of the superior gastric folds is certainly influenced by the degree of air distension of the esophagus. However, in our study, the proximal limit of the gastric mucosal folds was prospectively imaged while the oesophagus was minimally insufflated. Then, under a high level of air distension, the distal ends of the palisade-shaped longitudinal vessels were imaged because they are more easily observed when distended. In the majority of patients, the distal ends of the palisade-shaped longitudinal vessels correspond to the proximal limit of the gastric mucosal folds. Our endoscopic evaluation was appropriately performed according to the Prague C and M Criteria. We suspect that the high prevalence of BE in our study may be due to the inclusion of ultrashort-segment BE, which defines BE with an affected mucosal length under 5 mm, in our positive results.

Keywords: Barrett’s esophagus; Gastroesophageal junction; Squamocolumnar junction; Digital endoscopic images; Endoscopy