Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2011; 17(9): 1211-1218
Published online Mar 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i9.1211
p53 codon 72 polymorphism and liver cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies
Xi Chen, Fei Liu, Bo Li, Yong-Gang Wei, Lv-Nan Yan, Tian-Fu Wen
Xi Chen, Fei Liu, Bo Li, Yong-Gang Wei, Lv-Nan Yan, Tian-Fu Wen, Department of Liver and Vascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Road, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
Author contributions: Chen X and Liu F designed the study, collected and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; Li B and Wei YG collected and analyzed the data and revised the manuscript; Yan LN coordinated the working group and contributed to the discussion; Wen TF contributed to the discussion.
Correspondence to: Dr. Li Bo, Department of Liver and Vascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Road, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China. cdlibo688@163.com
Telephone: +86-28-85422476 Fax: +86-28-85423724
Received: September 15, 2010
Revised: December 14, 2010
Accepted: December 21, 2010
Published online: March 7, 2011
Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and liver cancer risk by means of meta-analysis.

METHODS: Two investigators independently searched the Medline, Embase and Chinese Biomedicine databases. Summary odds ratios and 95% CI for p53 codon 72 polymorphism and liver cancer were calculated in fixed-effects model (Mantel-Haenszel method) and random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method) when appropriate.

RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 1115 liver cancer cases and 1778 controls. The combined results based on all studies showed that there was a statistically significant link between Pro/Pro genotype and liver cancer, but not between Arg/Arg or Pro/Arg genotype and liver cancer. When stratifying for race, similar results were obtained, i.e. patients with liver cancer had a significantly higher frequency of Pro/Pro genotype than non-cancer patients among Asians. After stratifying the various studies by control source, gender, family history of liver cancer and chronic hepatitis virus infection, we found that (1) patients among hospital-based studies had a significantly higher frequency of Pro/Pro and a significantly lower frequency of Arg/Arg genotype than individuals without cancer; (2) female patients with liver cancer had a significantly lower frequency of Arg/Arg and a higher frequency of Pro/Arg+Pro/Pro genotypes than female individuals without cancer; (3) subgroup analyses for family history of liver cancer did not reveal any significant association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and liver cancer development; and (4) patients with negative hepatitis virus infection had a significantly higher frequency of Pro/Pro and a significantly lower frequency of Arg/Arg genotype than individuals without cancer.

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that the p53 codon 72 polymorphism may be associated with liver cancer among Asians.

Keywords: Liver cancer, p53 codon 72, Gene polymorphism, Meta-analysis