Guideline Clinical Practice
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2011; 17(42): 4660-4674
Published online Nov 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i42.4660
Systematic review of health-related quality of life after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
Marco Scarpa, Stefano Valente, Rita Alfieri, Matteo Cagol, Giorgio Diamantis, Ermanno Ancona, Carlo Castoro
Marco Scarpa, Stefano Valente, Rita Alfieri, Matteo Cagol, Giorgio Diamantis, Carlo Castoro, Oncological Surgery Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, 35128 Padova, Italy
Ermanno Ancona, Department of Gastrointestinal and Surgical Sciences, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
Author contributions: Scarpa M, Alfieri R, Ancona E and Castoro C designed the research; Scarpa M, Valente S, Cagol M and Diamantis G performed the research; Scarpa M, Valente S, Alfieri R and Diamantis G analyzed the data; Ancona E and Castoro C coordinated the research group and obtained the funds; Scarpa M, Cagol M, Ancona E and Castoro C wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Marco Scarpa, MD, Oncological Surgery Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padova, Italy. marcoscarpa73@yahoo.it
Telephone: +39-049-8211693 Fax: +39-049-8211694
Received: September 28, 2010
Revised: May 21, 2011
Accepted: May 28, 2011
Published online: November 14, 2011
Abstract

This study is aimed to assess the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in comparison with es-tablished norms, and to evaluate changes in HRQL during the different stages of follow-up after esophageal resection. A systematic review was performed by searching medical databases (Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library) for potentially relevant studies that appeared between January 1975 and March 2011. Studies were included if they addressed the question of HRQL after esophageal resection for esophageal cancer. Two researchers independently performed the study selection, data extraction and analysis processes. Twenty-one observational studies were included with a total of 1282 (12-355) patients. Five studies were performed with short form-36 (SF-36) and 16 with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 (14 of them also utilized the disease-specific OES18 or its previous version OES24). The analysis of long-term generic HRQL with SF-36 showed pooled scores for physical, role and social function after esophagectomy similar to United States norms, but lower pooled scores for physical function, vitality and general health perception. The analysis of HRQL conducted using the Global EORTC C30 global scale during a 6-mo follow-up showed that global scale and physical function were better at the baseline. The symptom scales indicated worsened fatigue, dyspnea and diarrhea 6 mo after esophagectomy. In contrast, however, emotional function had significantly improved after 6 mo. In conclusion, short- and long-term HRQL is deeply affected after esophagectomy for cancer. The impairment of physical function may be a long-term consequence of esophagectomy involving either the respiratory system or the alimentary tract. The short- and long-term improvement in the emotional function of patients who have undergone successful operations may be attributed to the impression that they have survived a near-death experience.

Keywords: Health-related quality of life; Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Short form 36; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer OES18