Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2011; 17(15): 1982-1988
Published online Apr 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i15.1982
Viscosity of food boluses affects the axial force in the esophagus
Flemming Gravesen, Niall Behan, Asbjorn Drewes, Hans Gregersen
Flemming Gravesen, Asbjorn Drewes, Mech-Sense, Aalborg Hospital, Hobrovej, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
Niall Behan, Vysera Biomedical Ltd., BMR House, Parkmore Business Park West, Galway, Ireland
Hans Gregersen, Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research, Niels Jensens Vej 2, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
Author contributions: All authors have contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence to: Flemming Gravesen, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus Universty, Aalborg 9000, Denmark. fgr@mech-sense.com
Telephone: +45-99326930 Fax: +45-98133060
Received: October 13, 2010
Revised: January 4, 2011
Accepted: January 11, 2011
Published online: April 21, 2011
Abstract

AIM: To study the effect of viscosity on axial force in the esophagus during primary peristalsis using a newly validated impedance-based axial force recording technique.

METHODS: A probe able to simultaneously measure both axial force and manometry was positioned above the lower esophageal sphincter. Potable tap water and three thickened fluids were used to create boluses of different viscosities. Water has a viscosity of 1 mPa·s. The three thickened fluids were made with different concentrations of Clinutren Instant thickener. The viscous fluids were in appearance comparable to pudding (2 kPa·s), yogurt (6 kPa·s) and slush ice (10 kPa·s). Six healthy volunteers swallowed 5 and 10 mL of boluses multiple times.

RESULTS: The pressure amplitude did not increase with the bolus viscosity nor with the bolus volume whereas the axial force increased marginally with bolus volume (0.1 > P > 0.05). Both techniques showed that contraction duration increased with bolus viscosity (P < 0.01). Association was found between axial force and pressure but the association became weaker with increasing viscosity. The pressure amplitude did not increase with the viscosity or bolus volume whereas the axial force increased marginally with the bolus size.

CONCLUSION: This indicates a discrepancy between the physiological functions that can be recorded with axial force measurements and pressure measurements.

Keywords: Axial force; Manometry; Esophagus; Primary peristalsis; Viscosity