Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2011; 17(11): 1475-1479
Published online Mar 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i11.1475
Anterior resection for rectal carcinoma - risk factors for anastomotic leaks and strictures
Ashok Kumar, Ram Daga, Paari Vijayaragavan, Anand Prakash, Rajneesh Kumar Singh, Anu Behari, Vinay K Kapoor, Rajan Saxena
Ashok Kumar, Ram Daga, Paari Vijayaragavan, Anand Prakash, Rajneesh Kumar Singh, Anu Behari, Vinay K Kapoor, Rajan Saxena, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
Author contributions: Kumar A designed the study; Kumar A, Daga R and Vijayragavan P drafted the manuscript; Daga R maintained the database and analyzed the data; Prakash A, Singh RK, Behari A and Kapoor VK provided the patients; Kumar A and Saxena R edited the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Dr. Ashok Kumar, MS, MCh, FACS, Additional Professor, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow 226014, India. dr_ashokgupta@yahoo.com
Telephone: +91-522-2668700 Fax: +91-522-2668017
Received: April 2, 2010
Revised: January 7, 2011
Accepted: January 14, 2011
Published online: March 21, 2011
Abstract

AIM: To determine the incidence and factors responsible for anastomotic leaks and stricture following anterior resection (AR) and its subsequent management.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data from 108 patients with rectal carcinoma who underwent AR or low anterior resection (LAR) to identify the various preoperative, operative, and post operative factors that might have influence on anastomotic leaks and strictures.

RESULTS: There were 68 males and 40 females with an average of 47 years (range 21-75 years). The median distance of the tumor from the anal verge was8 cm (range 3-15 cm). Sixty (55.6%) patients underwent handsewn anastomosis and 48 (44.4%) were stapled. The median operating time was 3.5 h (range 2.0-7.5 h). Sixteen (14.6%) patients had an anastomotic leak. Among these, 11 patients required re-exploration and five were managed expectantly. The anastomotic leak rate was similar in patients with and without diverting stoma (8/60, 13.4% with stoma and 8/48; 16.7% without stoma). In 15 (13.9%) patients, resection margins were positive for malignancy. Ninteen (17.6%) patients developed anastomotic strictures at a median duration of 8 mo (range 3-20 mo). Among these, 15 patients were successfully managed with per-anal dilatation. On multivariate analysis, advance age (> 60 years) was the only risk factor for anastomotic leak (P = 0.004). On the other hand, anastomotic leak (P = 0.00), mucin positive tumor (P = 0.021), and lower rectal growth (P = 0.011) were found as risk factors for the development of an anastomotic stricture.

CONCLUSION: Advance age is a risk factor for an anastomotic leak. An anastomotic leak, a mucin-secreting tumor, and lower rectal growth predispose patients to develop anastomotic strictures.

Keywords: Rectal carcinoma, Anterior resection, Anastomotic leak, Stricture