Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2011; 17(11): 1462-1467
Published online Mar 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i11.1462
Two cameras detect more lesions in the small-bowel than one
Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Ioannis S Papanikolaou, Kostis Papaxoinis, Spiros D Ladas
Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Ioannis S Papanikolaou, Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Attikon University General Hospital, Medical School, Athens University, 12464 Athens, Greece
Kostis Papaxoinis, Spiros D Ladas, 1st Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, Athens University, 11527 Athens, Greece
Author contributions: Triantafyllou K designed the research, performed the research, analyzed the data, wrote the paper and approved the final manuscript; Papanikolaou IS and Papaxoinis K performed the research, critically reviewed the paper and approved the final manuscript; Ladas SD critically reviewed the paper and approved the final manuscript.
Correspondence to: Dr. Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Attikon University General Hospital, Medical School, Athens University, Rimini 1, 12464 Athens, Greece. ktriant@med.uoa.gr
Telephone: +30-21-5832090 Fax: +30-21-5326422
Received: April 19, 2010
Revised: December 15, 2010
Accepted: December 22, 2010
Published online: March 21, 2011
Abstract

AIM: To explore the feasibility of dual camera capsule (DCC) small-bowel (SB) imaging and to examine if two cameras complement each other to detect more SB lesions.

METHODS: Forty-one eligible, consecutive patients underwent DCC SB imaging. Two experienced investigators examined the videos and compared the total number of detected lesions to the number of lesions detected by each camera separately. Examination tolerability was assessed using a questionnaire.

RESULTS: One patient was excluded. DCC cameras detected 68 positive findings (POS) in 20 (50%) cases. Fifty of them were detected by the “yellow” camera, 48 by the “green” and 28 by both cameras; 44% (n = 22) of the “yellow” camera’s POS were not detected by the “green” camera and 42% (n = 20) of the “green” camera’s POS were not detected by the “yellow” camera. In two cases, only one camera detected significant findings. All participants had 216 findings of unknown significance (FUS). The “yellow”, “green” and both cameras detected 171, 161, and 116 FUS, respectively; 32% (n = 55) of the “yellow” camera’s FUS were not detected by the “green” camera and 28% (n = 45) of the “green” camera’s FUS were not detected by the “yellow” camera. There were no complications related to the examination, and 97.6% of the patients would repeat the examination, if necessary.

CONCLUSION: DCC SB examination is feasible and well tolerated. The two cameras complement each other to detect more SB lesions.

Keywords: Small-bowel capsule endoscopy, Dual camera capsule endoscope, Feasibility, Lesion detection, Diagnostic yield