Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2010; 16(35): 4428-4435
Published online Sep 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i35.4428
Exercise-provoked esophageal motility disorder in patients with recurrent chest pain
Jacek Budzyński
Jacek Budzyński, Department of Gastroenterology, Vascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Ujejskiego 75 Street, 85-168 Bydgoszcz, Poland; Division of Vascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Dr Jan Biziel University Hospital No. 2 in Bydgoszcz, Ujejskiego 75 Street, 85-168 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Author contributions: Budzyński J solely conceived and designed this study, identified all the patients for the study, performed all examinations, recommended the subjects’ treatment, and followed them up, also performed the data collection, statistical analysis and interpretation, and wrote the paper.
Supported by A Grant from the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz for the statutory activity of the Department of Gastroenterology, Vascular Diseases, and Internal Medicine
Correspondence to: Dr. Jacek Budzyński, Division of Vascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Dr Jan Biziel University Hospital No. 2 in Bydgoszcz, Ujejskiego 75 Street, 85-168 Bydgoszcz, Poland. budz@cps.pl
Telephone: +48-52-3655347 Fax: +48-52-3655347
Received: May 5, 2010
Revised: May 31, 2010
Accepted: June 7, 2010
Published online: September 21, 2010
Abstract

AIM: To investigate the relationship between exercise-provoked esophageal motility disorders and the prognosis for patients with chest pain.

METHODS: The study involved 63 subjects with recurrent angina-like chest pain non-responsive to empirical therapy with proton pump inhibitor (PPI). In all, a coronary artery angiography, panendoscopy, 24-h esophageal pH-metry and manometry, as well as a treadmill stress test with simultaneous esophageal pH-metry and manometry monitoring, were performed. Thirty-five subjects had no significant coronary artery lesions, and 28 had more than 50% coronary artery narrowing. In patients with hypertensive esophageal motility disorders, a calcium antagonist was recommended. The average follow-up period was 977 ± 249 d.

RESULTS: The prevalence of esophageal disorders, such as gastroesophageal reflux or diffuse esophageal spasm, was similar in patients both with and without significant coronary artery narrowing. Exercise prompted esophageal motility disorders, such as a decrease in the percentage of peristaltic and effective contractions and their amplitude, as well as an increase in the percentage of simultaneous and non-effective contractions. In 14 (22%) patients the percentage of simultaneous contractions during the treadmill stress test exceeded the value of 55%. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the proportional hazard Cox regression model, it was shown that the administration of a calcium channel antagonist in patients with such an esophageal motility disorder significantly decreased the risk of hospitalization as a result of a suspicion of acute coronary syndrome after the 2.7-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSION: In patients with chest pain non-responsive to PPIs, a diagnosis of exercise-provoked esophageal spasm may have the effect of lowering the risk of the next hospitalization.

Keywords: Noncardiac chest pain, Esophageal motility, Calcium antagonist, Exercise, Provocative test, Follow-up