Editorial
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2010; 16(32): 3987-3994
Published online Aug 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i32.3987
Colorectal cancer screening: The role of CT colonography
Andrea Laghi, Franco Iafrate, Marco Rengo, Cesare Hassan
Andrea Laghi, Marco Rengo, Department of Radiological Sciences, Sapienza - Università di Roma, Polo Pontino, Latina 04100, Italy
Franco Iafrate, Department of Radiological Sciences, Sapienza - Università di Roma, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome 00161, Italy
Cesare Hassan, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ‘‘Nuovo Regina Margherita’’ Hospital, Rome 00153, Italy
Author contributions: Laghi A is the main author of this editorial; Iafrate F, Rengo M and Hassan C provided scientific background according to their experiences.
Correspondence to: Andrea Laghi, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Radiological Sciences, Sapienza - Università di Roma, Polo Pontino, Via Franco Faggiana 34, Latina 04100, Italy. andrea.laghi@uniroma1.it
Telephone: +39-335-8100145 Fax: +39-773-418400
Received: April 7, 2010
Revised: May 17, 2010
Accepted: May 24, 2010
Published online: August 28, 2010
Abstract

Computed tomography colonography (CTC) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has two roles: one present and the other potential. The present role is, without any further discussion, the integration into established screening programs as a replacement for barium enema in the case of incomplete colonoscopy. The potential role is the use of CTC as a first-line screening method together with Fecal Occult Blood Test, sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. However, despite the fact that CTC has been officially endorsed for CRC screening of average-risk individuals by different scientific societies including the American Cancer Society, the American College of Radiology, and the US Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, other entities, such as the US Preventive Services Task Force, have considered the evidence insufficient to justify its use as a mass screening method. Medicare has also recently denied reimbursement for CTC as a screening test. Nevertheless, multiple advantages exist for using CTC as a CRC screening test: high accuracy, full evaluation of the colon in virtually all patients, non-invasiveness, safety, patient comfort, detection of extracolonic findings and cost-effectiveness. The main potential drawback of a CTC screening is the exposure to ionizing radiation. However, this is not a major issue, since low-dose protocols are now routinely implemented, delivering a dose comparable or slightly superior to the annual radiation exposure of any individual. Indirect evidence exists that such a radiation exposure does not induce additional cancers.

Keywords: Computed tomography colonography, Colon neoplasms, Colon polyps, Colorectal cancer screening, Computed tomography colonography safety, Computed tomography colonography accuracy, Computed tomography colonography radiation exposure, Computed tomography colonography cost-effectiveness