Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2010; 16(2): 237-244
Published online Jan 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i2.237
Endoscopic ultrasonography can diagnose distal biliary strictures without a mass on computed tomography
Yasuyuki Saifuku, Michiko Yamagata, Takero Koike, Genyo Hitomi, Kazunari Kanke, Hidetaka Watanabe, Toshimitsu Murohisa, Masaya Tamano, Makoto Iijima, Keiichi Kubota, Hideyuki Hiraishi
Yasuyuki Saifuku, Michiko Yamagata, Takero Koike, Genyo Hitomi, Kazunari Kanke, Hidetaka Watanabe, Toshimitsu Murohisa, Masaya Tamano, Makoto Iijima, Hideyuki Hiraishi, Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan
Keiichi Kubota, Second Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan
Author contributions: Saifuku Y performed the research and analyzed the data; Yamagata M designed the study, analyzed the data and wrote the paper; Koike T, Hitomi G, Kanke K, Watanabe H, Murohisa T, Tamano M, Iijima M and Kubota K performed the clinical work; Hiraishi H reviewed the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Michiko Yamagata, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan. myamagat@dokkyomed.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-282-861111 Fax: +81-282-867761
Received: September 2, 2009
Revised: October 15, 2009
Accepted: October 22, 2009
Published online: January 14, 2010
Abstract

AIM: To assess the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for evaluating causes of distal biliary strictures shown on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), even without identifiable mass on computed tomography (CT).

METHODS: The diagnostic ability of EUS was retrospectively analyzed and compared with that of routine cytology (RC) and tumor markers in 34 patients with distal biliary strictures detected by ERCP or MRCP at Dokkyo Medical School Hospital from December 2005 to December 2008, without any adjacent mass or eccentric thickening of the bile duct on CT that could cause biliary strictures. Findings considered as benign strictures on EUS included preservation of the normal sonographic layers of the bile duct wall, irrespective of the presence of a mass lesion. Other strictures were considered malignant. Final diagnosis of underlying diseases was made by pathological examination in 18 cases after surgical removal of the samples, and by clinical follow-up for > 10 mo in 16 cases.

RESULTS: Seventeen patients (50%) were finally diagnosed with benign conditions, including 6 “normal” subjects, while 17 patients (50%) were diagnosed with malignant disease. In terms of diagnostic ability, EUS showed 94.1% sensitivity, 82.3% specificity, 84.2% positive predictive value, 93.3% negative predictive value (NPV) and 88.2% accuracy for identifying malignant and benign strictures. EUS was more sensitive than RC (94.1% vs 62.5%, P = 0.039). NPV was also better for EUS than for RC (93.3% vs 57.5%, P = 0.035). In addition, EUS provided significantly higher sensitivity than tumor markers using 100 U/mL as the cutoff level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (94.1% vs 53%, P = 0.017). On EUS, biliary stricture that was finally diagnosed as malignant showed as a hypoechoic, irregular mass, with obstruction of the biliary duct and invasion to surrounding tissues.

CONCLUSION: EUS can diagnose biliary strictures caused by malignant tumors that are undetectable on CT. Earlier detection by EUS would provide more therapeutic options for patients with early-stage pancreaticobiliary cancer.

Keywords: Computed tomography, Cytology, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic ultrasound, Indeterminate biliary stricture, Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, Tumor marker