Brief Articles
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2009; 15(29): 3649-3652
Published online Aug 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3649
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy without radiation
Adem Akcakaya, Orhan Veli Ozkan, Ismail Okan, Orhan Kocaman, Mustafa Sahin
Adem Akcakaya, Ismail Okan, Mustafa Sahin, 1st Department of General Surgery, Vakif Gureba Research and Training Hospital, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey
Orhan Veli Ozkan, Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University, 31100 Hatay, Turkey
Orhan Kocaman, Gastroenterology Division of Medical Faculty Hospital, Kocaeli University, 41380 Kocaeli, Turkey
Author contributions: Akcakaya A, Ozkan OV and Okan I designed the research and performed the research; Akcakaya A, Ozkan OV, Okan I, Kocaman O and Sahin M carried out the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript and statistical analysis.
Correspondence to: Orhan Veli Ozkan, Assistant Professor of General Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University, 31100 Hatay, Turkey. veliorhan@hotmail.com
Telephone: +90-326-2148661
Fax: +90-326-2148214
Received: May 12, 2009
Revised: June 23, 2009
Accepted: June 30, 2009
Published online: August 7, 2009
Abstract

AIM: To present our experience with pregnant patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) without using radiation, and to evaluate the acceptability of this alternative therapeutic pathway for ERCP during pregnancy.

METHODS: Between 2000 and 2008, six pregnant women underwent seven ERCP procedures. ERCP was performed under mild sedoanalgesia induced with pethidine HCl and midazolam. The bile duct was cannulated with a guidewire through the papilla. A catheter was slid over the guidewire and bile aspiration and/or visualization of the bile oozing around the guidewire was used to confirm correct cannulation. Following sphincterotomy, the bile duct was cleared by balloon sweeping. When indicated, stents were placed. Confirmation of successful biliary cannulation and stone extraction was made by laboratory, radiological and clinical improvement. Neither fluoroscopy nor spot radiography was used during the procedure.

RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 28 years (range, 21-33 years). The mean gestational age for the fetus was 23 wk (range, 14-34 wk). Five patients underwent ERCP because of choledocholithiasis and/or choledocholithiasis-induced acute cholangitis. In one case, a stone was extracted after precut papillotomy with a needle-knife, since the stone was impacted. One patient had ERCP because of persistent biliary fistula after hepatic hydatid disease surgery. Following sphincterotomy, scoleces were removed from the common bile duct. Two weeks later, because of the absence of fistula closure, repeat ERCP was performed and a stent was placed. The fistula was closed after stent placement. Neither post-ERCP complications nor premature birth or abortion was seen.

CONCLUSION: Non-radiation ERCP in experienced hands can be performed during pregnancy. Stent placement should be considered in cases for which complete common bile duct clearance is dubious because of a lack of visualization of the biliary tree.

Keywords: Cholangitis; Choledocholithiasis; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Jaundice; Pregnancy