Brief Articles
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2009; 15(23): 2908-2912
Published online Jun 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2908
Ampullary carcinoma: Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcome
Sheikh Anwar Abdullah, Tarun Gupta, Khairul Azhar Jaafar, Yaw Fui Alexander Chung, London Lucien Peng Jin Ooi, Steven Joseph Mesenas
Sheikh Anwar Abdullah, Tarun Gupta, Khairul Azhar Jaafar, Steven Joseph Mesenas, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, 169608, Singapore
Yaw Fui Alexander Chung, London Lucien Peng Jin Ooi, Department of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 169608, Singapore
Author contributions: Abdullah SA, Gupta T, Jaafar KA, Mesenas SJ performed data collection and analysis; Mesenas SJ, Chung YFA and Ooi LLPJ performed surgical and endoscopic procedures.
Correspondence to: Dr. Steven Joseph Mesenas, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road 169608, Singapore. steven.mesenas@sgh.com.sg
Telephone: +65-81253452
Fax: +65-62273625
Received: February 13, 2009
Revised: April 29, 2009
Accepted: May 6, 2009
Published online: June 21, 2009
Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the influence of preoperative biliary drainage on morbidity and mortality after surgical resection for ampullary carcinoma.

METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively data for 82 patients who underwent potentially curative surgery for ampullary carcinoma between September 1993 and July 2007 at the Singapore General Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital. Diagnosis of ampullary carcinoma was confirmed histologically. Thirty-five patients underwent preoperative biliary drainage (PBD group), and 47 were not drained (non-PBD group). The mode of biliary drainage was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (n = 33) or percutaneous biliary drainage (n = 2). The following parameters were analyzed: wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, intra-abdominal or gastrointestinal bleeding, septicemia, biliary or pancreatic leakage, pancreatitis, gastroparesis, and re-operation rate. Mortality was assessed at 30 d (hospital mortality) and also long-term. The statistical endpoint of this study was patient survival after surgery.

RESULTS: The groups were well matched for demographic criteria, clinical presentation and operative characteristics, except for lower hemoglobin in the non-PBD group (10.9 ± 1.6 vs 11.8 ± 1.6 in the PBD group). Of the parameters assessing postoperative morbidity, incidence of wound infection was significantly less in the PBD than the non-PBD group [1 (2.9%) vs 12 (25.5%)]. However, the rest of the parameters did not differ significantly between the groups, i.e. sepsis [10 (28.6%) vs 14 (29.8%)], intra-abdominal bleeding [1 (2.9%) vs 5 (10.6%)], intra-abdominal abscess [1 (2.9%) vs 8 (17%)], gastrointestinal bleeding [3 (8.6%) vs 5 (10.6%)], pancreatic leakage [2 (5.7%) vs 3 (6.4%)], biliary leakage [2 (5.7%) vs 3 (6.4%)], pancreatitis [2 (5.7%) vs 2 (4.3%)], gastroparesis [6 (17.1%) vs 10 (21.3%)], need for blood transfusion [10 (28.6%) vs 17 (36.2%)] and re-operation rate [1 (2.9%) vs 5 (10.6%)]. There was no early mortality in either group. Median survival was 44 mo (95% CI: 34.2-53.8) in the PBD group and 41 mo (95% CI: 27.7-54.3; P = 0.86) in the non-PBD group.

CONCLUSION: Biliary drainage before surgery for ampullary cancer significantly reduced postoperative wound infection. Overall mortality was not influenced by preoperative drainage.

Keywords: Ampullary carcinoma; Preoperative biliary drainage; Postoperative complications