Brief Articles
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2009; 15(11): 1353-1358
Published online Mar 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.1353
Management of pancreaticobiliary disease using a new intra-ductal endoscope: The Texas experience
Douglas S Fishman, Paul R Tarnasky, Sandeep N Patel, Isaac Raijman
Douglas S Fishman, Texas Children’s Hospital, Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, United States
Paul R Tarnasky, Digestive Health Associates, Methodist Pavilion II 221 West Colorado Blvd. Dallas, TX 75208-2359, United States
Sandeep N Patel, Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, United States
Isaac Raijman, Digestive Associates of Houston, 6620 Main Street. Houston, TX 77030, United States
Author contributions: Fishman DS wrote the manuscript, Tarnasky PR and Patel SN performed procedures and were involved in editing the manuscript; Raijman I designed the study, performed procedures and wrote the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Isaac Raijman, MD, Digestive Associates of Houston, 6620 Main Street. Houston, TX 77030, United States. iraijman@dahpa.com
Telephone: +1-713-7955260
Fax: +1-713-7955254
Received: October 22, 2008
Revised: December 31, 2008
Accepted: January 7, 2009
Published online: March 21, 2009
Abstract

AIM: To evaluate a new single-operator mini-endoscope, Spyglass®, for its performance, feasibility and safety in the management of pancreaticobiliary disease.

METHODS: In a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients undergoing intraductal endoscopy, we evaluated 128 patients (71 men, mean age 57.6 years). Indications were therapeutic (TX) in 72 (56%) and diagnostic (DX) in 56 (44%).

RESULTS: Peroral endoscopy was performed in 121 and percutaneous in seven. TX indications included CBD stones in 41, PD stones in six, and biliary strictures in 25. DX indications included abnormal LFT’s in 15, abnormal imaging in 38 and cholangiocarcinoma staging in three. Visualization of the stone(s) was considered good in 31, fair in six, and poor in four. Advancement of the electrohydraulic lithotripsy probe was not possible in three patients and proper targeting of the lesion was partial in four patients. A holmium laser was used successfully in three patients. Ductal clearance was achieved in 37 patients after one procedure and in four patients after two procedures. Diagnosis of biliary strictures was modified in 20/29 and confirmed to be malignant in 10/23. Of the modified patients, no diagnosis was available in 17. Spyglass® demonstrated malignancy in 8/17 and non-malignancy in nine. Suspected pathology by imaging studies and abnormal LFT’s was modified in 43/63 (66%). Staging of cholangiocarcinoma demonstrated multicentric cholangiocarcinoma in 2/3. There was no morbidity associated with the use of Spyglass®.

CONCLUSION: Spyglass Spyscope® is a first generation, single operator miniature endoscope that can evaluate and treat various biliary and pancreatic tract diseases.

Keywords: Intra-ductal endoscopy, Choledochoscopy, Cholangiopancreatoscopy, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Biliary disease, Sclerosing cholangitis, Cholangiocarcinoma, Lithotripsy, Pancreatic disease, Spyglass®