Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2008; 14(42): 6546-6550
Published online Nov 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.6546
Comparison of four models for end-stage liver disease in evaluating the prognosis of cirrhosis
Ming Jiang, Fei Liu, Wu-Jun Xiong, Lan Zhong, Xi-Mei Chen
Ming Jiang, Fei Liu, Wu-Jun Xiong, Lan Zhong, Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China
Xi-Mei Chen, Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China
Author contributions: Jiang M, Liu F, Xiong WJ and Chen XM designed the research; Jiang M and Zhong L performed the research; and Jiang M wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Fei Liu, Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, 150 Jimo Road, Shanghai 200120, China. liufeiguo2010@163.com
Telephone: +86-21-38804518-7221 Fax: +86-21-58798999
Received: September 1, 2008
Revised: September 16, 2008
Accepted: September 23, 2008
Published online: November 14, 2008
Abstract

AIM: To investigate the prognostic value of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and three new MELD-based models combination with serum sodium in decompensated cirrhosis patients-the MELD with the incorporation of serum sodium (MELD-Na), the integrated MELD (iMELD), and the MELD to sodium (MESO) index.

METHODS: A total of 166 patients with decompensated cirrhosis were enrolled into the study. MELD, MELD-Na, iMELD and MESO scores were calculated for each patient following the original formula on the first day of admission. All patients were followed up at least 1 year. The predictive prognosis related with the four models was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the four parameters. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were made using the cut-offs identified by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC).

RESULTS: Out of 166 patients, 38 patients with significantly higher MELD-Na (28.84 ± 2.43 vs 14.72 ± 0.60), iMELD (49.04 ± 1.72 vs 35.52 ± 0.67), MESO scores (1.59 ± 0.82 vs 0.99 ± 0.42) compared to the survivors died within 3 mo (P < 0.001). Of 166 patients, 75 with markedly higher MELD-Na (23.01 ± 1.51 vs 13.78 ± 0.69), iMELD (44.06 ± 1.19 vs 34.12 ± 0.69), MESO scores (1.37 ± 0.70 vs 0.93 ± 0.40) than the survivors died within 1 year (P < 0.001). At 3 mo of enrollment, the iMELD had the highest AUC (0.841), and was followed by the MELD-Na (0.766), MESO (0.723), all larger than MELD (0.773); At 1 year, the iMELD still had the highest AUC (0.783), the difference between the iMELD and MELD was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Survival curves showed that the three new models were all clearly discriminated the patients who survived or died in short-term as well as intermediate-term (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Three new models, changed with serum sodium (MELD-Na, iMELD, MESO) can exactly predict the prognosis of patients with decompensated cirrhosis for short and intermediate period, and may enhance the prognostic accuracy of MELD. The iMELD is better prognostic model for outcome prediction in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

.

Keywords: Cirrhosis, Model for end-stage liver disease, Serum sodium, Prognosis, Survival time