Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2008; 14(28): 4445-4453
Published online Jul 28, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4445
Hepatocellular carcinoma: Defining the place of surgery in an era of organ shortage
Adam Bartlett, Nigel Heaton
Adam Bartlett, Nigel Heaton, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College School of Medicine at Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, Camberwell, London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
Author contributions: Bartlett A and Heaton N contributed equally to reviewing the literature and preparing the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Nigel Heaton, Professor, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College School of Medicine at Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom. nigel.heaton@kch.nhs.uk
Telephone: +44-20-33999000
Fax: +44-20-32993575
Received: February 15, 2008
Revised: May 28, 2008
Accepted: June 4, 2008
Published online: July 28, 2008
Abstract

Liver resection (LR) and transplantation offer the only potential chance of cure for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Historically, all patients were treated by hepatic resection. With the advent of liver transplantation (LT) patients with HCC were preferentially placed on the waiting list for LT. However, early experience with LT was associated with a high rate of tumour recurrence and poor long-term survival. The increasing scarcity of donor livers resulted in restrictions being placed on tumour size, and an improvement in patient survival. To date there have been no randomised clinical trials comparing LR to LT. We review the evidence supporting LR and/or LT for HCC and discuss the role of neoadjuvant therapy. The decision of whether to resect or transplant remains debatable and is often determined by centre experience, availability of LT and donor organs.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver transplantation; Liver resection; Adjuvant therapy; Salvage liver transplantation; Radiofrequency ablation; Transarterial chemoembolization