Liver Cancer
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2006; 12(43): 6955-6960
Published online Nov 21, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i43.6955
Efficacy and safety of thalidomide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Hsueh-Erh Chiou, Tsang-En Wang, Ying-Yue Wang, Hui-Wen Liu
Hsueh-Erh Chiou, Ying-Yue Wang, Hui-Wen Liu, Pharmacy Department, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
Tsang-En Wang, Gastroenterology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Hui-Wen Liu, MS, Pharmacy Department, Mackay Memorial Hospital, 92, Sec 2, Chung-Shan North Road, Taipei 10449, Taiwan, China. rose211@ms1.mmh.org.tw
Telephone: +886-2-25433535-3284 Fax: +886-2-25433535-3348
Received: April 22, 2005
Revised: May 25, 2005
Accepted: June 2, 2005
Published online: November 21, 2006
Abstract

AIM: To evaluate which patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are most likely to respond to thalidomide treatment.

METHODS: From July 2002 to July 2004, patients with HCC who received thalidomide treatment, were enrolled. We extracted relevant data from the patients’ medical records, including history and type of hepatitis, comorbidity, serum α-fetoprotein (α-FP) level, volumetric changes in tumor, length of survival, and the dose, duration, side effects of thalidomide treatment. The tumor response was evaluated. On the basis of these data, the patients were divided into two groups: those with either partial response or stable disease (PR + SD group) and those with progressive disease (PD group).

RESULTS: Two of 42 (5%) patients had a partial tumor response after treatment with thalidomide, 200 mg/d, and 9 (21%) had stable disease. Patients in the PR + SD group all had cirrhosis. Comparing patients with and without cirrhosis, the former were more likely to respond to thalidomide therapy (PR + SD: 100% vs PD: 64.5%, P = 0.041 < 0.05). Thalidomide was significantly more likely to be effective in tumors smaller than 5 cm (PR + SD: 63.6% vs PD: 25.8%, P = 0.034 < 0.05). Compared with patients with progressive disease (PD), patients in the PR + SD group had a higher total dose of thalidomide (13 669.4 ± 8446.0 mg vs 22 022.7 ± 11 461.4 mg, P = 0.023 < 0.05) and a longer survival (181.0 ± 107.1 d vs 304.4 ± 167.1 d, P = 0.047 < 0.05). Patients with comorbid disease had a significantly greater incidence of adverse reactions than those without (93.8% vs 60.0%, P = 0.021 < 0.05). The average number of adverse reactions in each person with a comorbid condition was twice as high as in those without other diseases (2.2 ± 1.3 vs 1.1 ± 1.2; P = 0.022 < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Thalidomide therapy is most likely to be effective in patients with early stage small HCC, especially in those with other underlying diseases. A low dose (200 mg/d) of thalidomide is recommended to continue the treatment long enough to make it more effective.

Keywords: Thalidomide; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Antiangiogenic agents; Adverse events