Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2006; 12(30): 4794-4806
Published online Aug 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i30.4794
Conventional therapy for Crohn’s disease
Carsten Büning, Herbert Lochs
Carsten Büning, Herbert Lochs, Department of Gastroenter-ology, Hepatology & Endocrinology, Charité Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Carsten Büning, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Endocrinology, Charité Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Schumannstrasse 20/21, Berlin 10117, Germany. carsten.buening@charite.de
Telephone: +49-30-450614237 Fax: +49-30-450514906
Received: February 17, 2006
Revised: March 1, 2006
Accepted: March 10, 2006
Published online: August 14, 2006
Abstract

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a multifactorial disorder of unknown cause. Outstanding progress regarding the pathophysiology of CD has led to the development of innovative therapeutic concepts. Numerous controlled trials have been performed in CD over the last years. However, many drugs have not been approved by regulatory authorities due to lack of efficacy or severe side effects. Therefore, well-known drugs, including 5-ASA, systemic or topical corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, are still the mainstay of CD therapy. Importantly, biologicals such as infliximab have shown to be efficacious in problematic settings such as fistulizing or steroid-dependent CD. This review is intended to give practical guidelines to clinicians for the conventional treatment of CD. We concentrated on the results of randomized, placebo-controlled trials and meta-analyses, when available, that provide the highest degree of evidence. We provide evidence-based treatment algorithms whenever possible. However, many clinical situations have not been answered by controlled clinical trials and it is important to fill these gaps through expert opinions. We hope that this review offers a useful tool for clinicians in the challenging treatment of CD.

Keywords: Crohn's disease; Conventional treatment; Review; Therapy