Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2006; 12(26): 4199-4202
Published online Jul 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4199
Results of gastroscope bacterial decontamination by enzymatic detergent compared to chlorhexidine
Rungsun Rerknimitr, Sorapat Eakthunyasakul, Pongpan Nunthapisud, Pradermchai Kongkam
Rungsun Rerknimitr, Sorapat Eakthunyasakul, Pradermchai Kongkam, Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Pongpan Nunthapisud, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Correspondence to: Rungsun Rerknimitr, MD, Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. rungsun@pol.net
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Telephone: +66-2-2564265 Fax: +66-2-2527839
Received: February 18, 2006
Revised: March 5, 2006
Accepted: March 13, 2006
Published online: July 14, 2006
Abstract

AIM: To compare the efficacy of enzymatic detergent with chlorhexidine for gastroscope bacterial decontamination.

METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study was undertaken to evaluate the ability of these 2 agents to achieve high level disinfection in a gastroscope. A total of 260 samples were collected from 5 different gastroscopes. Manual cleaning was done for 10 min with these 2 agents separately (n = 130 each). Then all specimens underwent 2% glutaraldehyde soaking for 20 min. After 70% alcohol was rinsed, sterile normal saline was flushed into each gastroscope channel and 40 mL of sample was collected. The sample was sent for aerobic bacterial culture after membrane was filtered. A colony count greater than 200 cfu/mL was considered significant.

RESULTS: The positive culture rate was 4.6% in the enzymatic detergent arm and 3.1% in the chlorhexidine arm. Pseudomonas species were the main organism detected from both groups (60%). Multiple organisms were found from 4 specimens (enzymatic detergent arm = 1, chlorhexidine arm = 3).

CONCLUSION: The contamination rate of both types of cleaning solution is equivalent.

Keywords: Enzymatic detergent; Gastroscope; Bacterial decontamination