Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2006; 12(26): 4181-4184
Published online Jul 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4181
Mass-forming pancreatitis: Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
Mirko D’Onofrio, Giulia Zamboni, Alessia Tognolini, Roberto Malagò, Niccolò Faccioli, Luca Frulloni, Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
Mirko D’Onofrio, Giulia Zamboni, Alessia Tognolini, Roberto Pozzi Mucelli, Roberto Malago’, Niccolo’ Faccioli, Department of Radiology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Luca Frulloni, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Mirko D’Onofrio, MD, Department of Radiology, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 37134 Verona, Italy. mirko.donofrio@univr.it
Telephone: +39-45-8074301 Fax: +39-45-8277808
Received: January 21, 2006
Revised: February 15, 2006
Accepted: February 18, 2006
Published online: July 14, 2006
Abstract

AIM: To assess the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with a second-generation contrast medium in the differential diagnosis between mass-forming pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS: From our radio-pathology database, we retrieved all the patients affected by mass-forming pancreatitis or pancreatic carcinoma who underwent CEUS. We evaluated the results of CEUS in the study of the 173 pancreatic masses considering the possibilities of a differential diagnosis between mass-forming pancreatitis and pancreatic tumor by identifying the “parenchymographic” enhancement during the dynamic phase of CEUS, which was considered diagnostic for mass-forming pancreatitis.

RESULTS: At CEUS, 94% of the mass-forming pancreatitis showed intralesional parenchymography. CEUS allowed diagnosis of mass-forming pancreatitis with sensitivity of 88.6%, specificity of 97.8%, positive predictive value of 91.2%, negative predictive value of 97.1%, and overall accuracy of 96%. CEUS significantly increased the diagnostic confidence in the differential diagnosis between mass-forming pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma, with receiver operating characteristic curve areas from 0.557 (P = 0.1608) for baseline US to 0.956 (P < 0.0001) for CEUS.

CONCLUSION: CEUS allowed diagnosis of mass-forming pancreatitis with diagnostic accuracy of 96%. CEUS significantly increases the diagnostic confidence with respect to basal US in discerning mass-forming pancreatitis from pancreatic neoplasm.

Keywords: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; Pancreatitis; Pancreatic neoplasm; Mass-forming pancreatitis