Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2006; 12(1): 123-126
Published online Jan 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i1.123
Evaluation of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in detection of local recurrent colorectal cancer
Yau-Tong You, Chung-Rong Chang Chien, Jeng-Yi Wang, Koon-Kwan Ng, Jinn-Shiun Chen, Reiping Tang, Jy-Ming Chiang, Chien-Yuh Yeh, Pao-Shiu Hsieh
Yau-Tong You, Chung-Rong Chang Chien, Jinn-Shiun Chen, Reiping Tang, Jy-Ming Chiang, Chien-Yuh Yeh, Pao-Shiu Hsieh, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Lin-Kou, Taiwan
Jeng-Yi Wang, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Jia-Yi, Taiwan
Koon-Kwan Ng, Department of Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kee-Lung, Taiwan
Correspondence to: Yau-Tong You, MD, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kuei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan. proct@adm.cgmh.org.tw
Telephone: +886-3-3281200 ext.2101 Fax: +886-3-3278355
Received: May 9, 2005
Revised: June 8, 2005
Accepted: June 18, 2005
Published online: January 7, 2006
Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in detecting local recurrence of colorectal cancer.

METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2004, 434 patients after potentially curative resection for invasive colorectal cancer were followed up for a period ranging from 20 to 55 mo. Eighty of the four hundred and thirty-four patients showing strong clinical evidence for recurring colorectal cancer during the last follow-up were enrolled in this study. Each patient underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography and colonoscopy on the same day. Any lesions, biopsies, identified during the colonoscopic examination, immediate complications and the duration of the procedure were recorded. The results of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography were evaluated by comparing to those of colonoscopy, surgical finding, and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 83% and an overall accuracy of 94% in detecting local recurrent colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION: Conventional colonoscopy and contrast-enhanced tomographic colonography can complement each other in detecting local recurrence of colorectal cancer.

Keywords: Computed tomographic colonography, Recurrent colorectal cancer