Brief Reports
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2005. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2005; 11(38): 6056-6060
Published online Oct 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i38.6056
Interaction models of CYP1A1, GSTM1 polymorphisms and tobacco smoking in intestinal gastric cancer
Jing Shen, Run-Tian Wang, Yao-Chu Xu, Li-Wei Wang, Xin-Ru Wang
Jing Shen, Yao-Chu Xu, Xin-Ru Wang, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schoolof Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
Jing Shen, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
Run-Tian Wang, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China
Li-Wei Wang, Yang Zhong Cancer Research Institute, Yang Zhong City Municipal Hospital, Yang Zhong 212200, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 30170827 and 30070671
Correspondence to: Dr. Jing Shen, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 701 West 168th Street (Room 505), New York, NY 10032, USA. js2182@columbia.edu
Telephone: +1-212-3058158 Fax: +1-212-3055328
Received: January 7, 2004
Revised: April 1, 2005
Accepted: April 2, 2005
Published online: October 14, 2005
Abstract

AIM: To explore the interaction models of the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 1A1 Val variant and glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1 null polymorphisms with tobacco smoking in the occurrence of intestinal gastric cancer.

METHODS: A community-based case-control study was conducted in Yangzhong. Subjects included 114 intestinal types of gastric cancer with endoscopic and pathological diagnosis during January 1997 and December 1998, and 693 controls selected from their spouse, siblings or siblings-in-law who had no history of digestive system cancer. Logistic regression was used to estimate the interaction models.

RESULTS: The frequency of the CYP1A1 Val variant allele in cases did not differ from that in controls. The OR of GSTM1 null genotype was 2.0 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.2-3.1, P<0.01). It showed a significant type 2 form of interaction model when both CYP1A1 Valvariant allele and former tobacco smoking existed (i.e., among the multiplicative effects, the disease risk is increased by the tobacco exposure alone but not by the CYP1A1 variant alone). The interaction index g was 2.8, and OReg(95%CI) was 5.0 (1.9-13.4). GSTM1 null genotype and former tobacco smoking were significant in a type 4 interaction model (i.e., the disease risk is increased by GSTM1 null genotype or tobacco exposure alone among the multiplicative effects). The interaction index g and OReg (95%CI) were 3.4 and 8.4 (3.4-20.9), respectively.

CONCLUSION: Different interaction models of CYP1A1 Val variant allele and GSTM1 null genotype with tobacco smoking will contribute to understanding carcinogenic mechanism, but there is a need to further investigate in larger scale studies.

Keywords: Interaction models; CYP1A1; GSTM1; Tobacco smoking; Intestinal gastric cancer